Skip to content

[13.0][MIG] stock_storage_type_putaway_abc #14

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

grindtildeath
Copy link
Contributor

@grindtildeath grindtildeath commented Jan 13, 2020

@simahawk simahawk added this to the 13.0 milestone Jan 29, 2020
@grindtildeath grindtildeath force-pushed the 13.0-mig-stock_storage_type_putaway_abc branch 2 times, most recently from 64b99ef to b0d409a Compare April 22, 2020 09:55
guewen added a commit to guewen/wms that referenced this pull request May 18, 2020
cluster picking: implement /stock_issue
Copy link
Member

@jgrandguillaume jgrandguillaume left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jgrandguillaume
Copy link
Member

@guewen Can we see to mege this one ?

@guewen
Copy link
Member

guewen commented Jul 6, 2020

@grindtildeath Can you rebase?

grindtildeath and others added 7 commits July 6, 2020 11:04
if product is None, then accessing the abc_storage will crash.

This happens when the method is called from
stock_storage_type_putaway_strategy/models/stock_storage_location_sequence.py, line 25
Allow to compute restrictions for multiple products and quants

Use helper field from stock_location_children

Remove dependency after merge of putaway_strategy into storage_type

pre-commit + setup tools
* multiple assignment would use the same record for a_locations, b_locations and c_locations -> no sorting performed
* if product is an empty recordset, it has no abc_storage -> a useless sorting is performed
* the union operator on recordsets is not very efficient -> prefer list.append and browse the result
We will never do a put-away in an intermediate location,
so they should never be kept as candidate locations for the
put-away.

Follow the change in OCA#12
@grindtildeath grindtildeath force-pushed the 13.0-mig-stock_storage_type_putaway_abc branch from 97e385f to b2e8d4c Compare July 6, 2020 09:04
@guewen
Copy link
Member

guewen commented Aug 27, 2020

/ocabot merge patch

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 13.0-ocabot-merge-pr-14-by-guewen-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

OCA-git-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2020
Signed-off-by guewen
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like something changed on 13.0 in the meantime.
Let me try again (no action is required from you).
Prepared branch 13.0-ocabot-merge-pr-14-by-guewen-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 191bcbf into OCA:13.0 Aug 27, 2020
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 3aa9db4. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants