-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 198
[13.0][MIG] stock_storage_type_putaway_abc #14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[13.0][MIG] stock_storage_type_putaway_abc #14
Conversation
64b99ef
to
b0d409a
Compare
cluster picking: implement /stock_issue
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@guewen Can we see to mege this one ? |
@grindtildeath Can you rebase? |
if product is None, then accessing the abc_storage will crash. This happens when the method is called from stock_storage_type_putaway_strategy/models/stock_storage_location_sequence.py, line 25
Allow to compute restrictions for multiple products and quants Use helper field from stock_location_children Remove dependency after merge of putaway_strategy into storage_type pre-commit + setup tools
* multiple assignment would use the same record for a_locations, b_locations and c_locations -> no sorting performed * if product is an empty recordset, it has no abc_storage -> a useless sorting is performed * the union operator on recordsets is not very efficient -> prefer list.append and browse the result
We will never do a put-away in an intermediate location, so they should never be kept as candidate locations for the put-away. Follow the change in OCA#12
97e385f
to
b2e8d4c
Compare
/ocabot merge patch |
Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you. |
It looks like something changed on |
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 3aa9db4. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
Depends on: