Skip to content

[16.0][ADD] project_scoped_tags #1519

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 16.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

maisim
Copy link

@maisim maisim commented Jun 3, 2025

New module to modify tags behavior for projects and tasks, inspired by GitLab’s tag scoping.

This allow to limit tag availability by projects

Sould be used with "Optional quick create" module

This project differs from project_task_tag, which requires applying the tags you want to use on tasks to the project itself.
Here, you define the tasks available for the project and its tasks.

This is a start; we can later easily add the ability to filter by project type, make tags specific to tasks, etc.

@maisim maisim force-pushed the 16.0-add-project_scoped_tags branch 3 times, most recently from b760b24 to 984abc3 Compare June 3, 2025 14:34
New module to modify tags behavior for projects and tasks, inspired by GitLab’s tag scoping.

This allow to limit tag availability by projects

Sould be used with "Optional quick create" module to force projects
managers to manage tags from the dedicated view.

This module does not modify the upstream operation of the tags, it should to be installed and
uninstalled without affecting the data already in place
@maisim maisim force-pushed the 16.0-add-project_scoped_tags branch from 984abc3 to 0ea256c Compare June 3, 2025 14:48
Copy link

@mourad-ehm mourad-ehm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants