Skip to content

add clear certificate option #9

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 28, 2025

Conversation

AlxZchk
Copy link
Contributor

@AlxZchk AlxZchk commented Feb 28, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced certificate management allows users to clear existing certificates before uploading new ones.
    • Improved management processes now include better handling of certificate retrieval and deletion with robust error reporting.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 28, 2025

Walkthrough

This PR updates the CloudFlare class in cloudflare.js by modifying the uploadTlsClientAuth method to include a new clear parameter. When clear is set to true, existing custom client and CA certificates are cleared before proceeding with an upload. The update adds new methods to retrieve certificate IDs (getClientCerts, getCaCerts) and to delete certificates by their IDs (deleteClientCert, deleteCaCert), along with a dedicated method (clearCustomCerts) to handle the clearance process.

Changes

File Change Summary
cloudflare.js Modified uploadTlsClientAuth to include a clear parameter. Added methods: clearCustomCerts, getClientCerts, getCaCerts, deleteClientCert, and deleteCaCert with error handling.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User as Caller
    participant CF as CloudFlare

    User->>CF: uploadTlsClientAuth({clientKey, clientCert, caCert, clear})
    alt clear parameter is true
        CF->>CF: clearCustomCerts()
        CF->>CF: getClientCerts() & getCaCerts()
        alt Client certificates exist
            CF->>CF: deleteClientCert(certId)
        end
        alt CA certificates exist
            CF->>CF: deleteCaCert(certId)
        end
    end
    alt Certificate files provided
        CF->>CF: Read file contents and proceed with upload
    else
        CF->>User: Skip upload
    end
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • Firewall and redirect ruleset support #6: Contains similar modifications to the uploadTlsClientAuth method and introduces TLS client authentication functionalities, making it directly related at the code level.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
cloudflare.js (3)

812-829: Consider handling partial certificate arguments more explicitly.
Currently, the code only proceeds when all three of clientKey, clientCert, and caCert are provided. If partial updates or error feedback on missing parameters are needed, a refactor may be beneficial.


831-850: Fix mismatch in console error message for CA cert deletion.
The second loop logs "Failed to delete Client cert" even though it is deleting CA certs. Consider applying this change:

-        console.error(`Failed to delete Client cert: ${e?.message}`)
+        console.error(`Failed to delete CA cert: ${e?.message}`)

807-918: Add tests for new cert handling methods.
The new methods (clearCustomCerts, getClientCerts, getCaCerts, deleteClientCert, deleteCaCert) and the updated uploadTlsClientAuth could benefit from dedicated tests to ensure coverage and prevent regressions.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3b34026 and a9a905a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cloudflare.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
cloudflare.js (5)

807-811: Implementation of 'clear' parameter is correct.
This block correctly checks the clear flag before calling clearCustomCerts(). No issues identified.


852-868: Looks good!
The retrieval of client certificate IDs is implemented cleanly.


870-886: Straightforward retrieval of CA certificates.
This logic closely mirrors the client cert retrieval and appears correct.


888-902: Deletion logic for client certs is correct.
No concerns spotted.


904-918: Deletion logic for CA certs is correct.
No concerns spotted.

@nosovk nosovk merged commit 13b3a64 into NodeArt:main Feb 28, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants