Rustify code #120
Rustify code #120
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes refactor the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant CLI as CLI Command
participant TS as execute_take_sell Function
participant Parser as Invoice Parser
participant Logger as Error Logger
participant Order as Message::new_order
CLI->>TS: Invoke execute_take_sell(invoice, amount)
TS->>TS: Match invoice value
alt Invoice Provided
TS->>Parser: Try parsing as LightningAddress
alt Parsing Succeeds
Parser-->>TS: initial_payload with address
else Parsing Fails
TS->>TS: Check invoice validity
alt Invoice Valid
TS-->>TS: Create PaymentRequest with invoice
else Invoice Invalid
TS->>Logger: Log error
TS-->>TS: Create default PaymentRequest with invoice
end
end
TS->>TS: Incorporate amount if provided
else No Invoice
TS->>TS: Create Payload::Amount (defaulting to 0 if None)
end
TS-->>Order: Pass Some(payload) to Message::new_order
Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/cli/take_sell.rs (2)
30-56: Improved functional style and error handling for payload construction.The refactoring replaces conditional logic with clean pattern matching, eliminating mutable state and improving code clarity. The approach properly handles different cases for the invoice parameter and integrates amount processing.
Consider enhancing the error handling by logging the specific error when
LightningAddress::from_strfails:- Err(_) => match is_valid_invoice(&inv) { + Err(e) => { + println!("Failed to parse as Lightning Address: {}", e); + match is_valid_invoice(&inv) {Also, consider validating if zero is an appropriate default for
Payload::Amountwhen no amount is provided:- .unwrap_or(Payload::Amount(0)), + .unwrap_or_else(|| { + println!("Warning: No amount provided, defaulting to zero"); + Payload::Amount(0) + }),
27-27: Unnecessary clone in println! macro.The
mostro_key.clone()is unnecessary since Rust's formatting macros take references, not ownership.- mostro_key.clone() + mostro_key
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/cli/take_sell.rs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/cli/take_sell.rs (1)
65-65: Improved safety by ensuring payload is always Some value.This change ensures that the payload is always wrapped in
Some, making the code more robust by eliminating the possibility of passingNonetoMessage::new_order.
Summary by CodeRabbit