Skip to content

feat: expose crdvalidation testsuite types: TestCasesGroup and TestCases #220

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

pmalek
Copy link
Member

@pmalek pmalek commented Jan 10, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it:

Expose crdvalidation testsuite types: TestCasesGroup and TestCases so that they can be used outside of kcfg repo (e.g. in KGO CRD validation tests).

xref: Kong/gateway-operator#984 (comment)

Release 1.0.5

Which issue this PR fixes

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

PR Readiness Checklist:

Complete these before marking the PR as ready to review:

  • the CHANGELOG.md release notes have been updated to reflect significant changes

@pmalek pmalek force-pushed the export-crdvalidation-testcase-types branch from 2dffc64 to b1e061d Compare January 10, 2025 15:16
Copy link
Contributor

@czeslavo czeslavo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@programmer04
Copy link
Member

Good! One thing to consider, maybe all those YAMLs should be covered by .gitattributes to not show diffs in GH review, WDYT?

@pmalek
Copy link
Member Author

pmalek commented Jan 10, 2025

Good! One thing to consider, maybe all those YAMLs should be covered by .gitattributes to not show diffs in GH review, WDYT?

That might make sense. Even though those are quire important to review on a PR they are generate to it's a good idea. Let me handle that in a separate PR.

@pmalek pmalek merged commit b7bc51a into main Jan 10, 2025
9 checks passed
@pmalek pmalek deleted the export-crdvalidation-testcase-types branch January 10, 2025 19:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants