Skip to content

update readme with better fitting interpolation #45

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 10, 2021

Conversation

marius311
Copy link
Contributor

As noted here, the current example in the readme is actually kind of a bad interpolation on the lower end. Seems worth it to highlight the strengths, so this tweaks the span argument to make it look better. Also I just embedded the image (30kb) in the repo which seems less prone to breaking in the future. This is Random.seed!(1) w/ Julia 1.6 should anyone ever want to reproduce exactly.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #45 (51e43bf) into master (a4ae2f0) will increase coverage by 0.59%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #45      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.66%   92.26%   +0.59%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines         168      168              
==========================================
+ Hits          154      155       +1     
+ Misses         14       13       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/kd.jl 98.71% <0.00%> (+1.28%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a4ae2f0...51e43bf. Read the comment docs.

@marius311
Copy link
Contributor Author

No interest?

@andreasnoack andreasnoack merged commit a7dc989 into JuliaStats:master Nov 10, 2021
@andreasnoack
Copy link
Member

I agree that the example doesn't look too good so I'm fine with adjusting the span parameter.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants