Skip to content

fix: Reply to/all focus on the editor #768

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 2, 2023
Merged

fix: Reply to/all focus on the editor #768

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 2, 2023

Conversation

adrien-coye
Copy link
Contributor

Reply / Reply all focus on the editor

@adrien-coye adrien-coye self-assigned this Jun 2, 2023
@adrien-coye adrien-coye requested a review from a team as a code owner June 2, 2023 08:45
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jun 2, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

valentinperignon
valentinperignon approved these changes Jun 2, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@valentinperignon valentinperignon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@valentinperignon valentinperignon merged commit a1499c5 into master Jun 2, 2023
@valentinperignon valentinperignon deleted the setCursorOnReplyInBody branch June 2, 2023 08:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@valentinperignon valentinperignon valentinperignon approved these changes

Assignees

@adrien-coye adrien-coye

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@adrien-coye @valentinperignon