Skip to content

fix: format is not "AWF" but "UTILTS" #10

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 31, 2024
Merged

fix: format is not "AWF" but "UTILTS" #10

merged 3 commits into from
May 31, 2024

Conversation

hf-kklein
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@hf-kklein hf-kklein merged commit a6e09ae into main May 31, 2024
@hf-kklein hf-kklein deleted the format-awf branch May 31, 2024 06:36
hf-kklein pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2025
summary: it seems like the shit isn't present in the XML at all.

From the screenshot in issue 621 it seems like we'd expect the two `E01` codes to both occur in the 00035 segment:

```xml
<S_STS
            Name="Transaktionsgrund / Ergänzung / Transaktionsgrund befristete Anmeldung"
            Number="00035"
            AHB_Status="Muss"
          >
	<C_C601 Name="Statuskategorie">
		<D_9015 Name="Statuskategorie, Code">
			<Code
                  Name="Transaktionsgrund"
                  Description=""
                  AHB_Status="X"
                >7</Code>
		</D_9015>
	</C_C601>
	<C_C556 Name="Statusanlaß">
		<D_9013 Name="Transaktionsgrund">
			<Code
                  Name="Ein-/Auszug (Umzug)"
                  Description="Kunde verlässt oder bezieht eine schon bestehende Marktlokation"
                  AHB_Status="X"
                >E01</Code>
			<Code
                  Name="Wechsel"
                  Description="- Kunde bleibt an der Marktlokation, hat nur den Marktpartner gewechselt&#13;&#10;- Marktpartner hat den Kunden gekündigt"
                  AHB_Status="X"
                >E03</Code>
		</D_9013>
	</C_C556>
	<C_C556 Name="Statusanlaß">
		<D_9013 Name="Transaktionsgrundergänzung">
			<Code
                  Name="Pauschale Marktlokation"
                  Description=""
                  AHB_Status="X"
                >ZW6</Code>
			<Code
                  Name="Gemessene Marktlokation"
                  Description=""
                  AHB_Status="X"
                >ZW7</Code>
			<Code
                  Name="ruhende Marktlokation"
                  Description=""
                  AHB_Status="X [519] ∧ [520]"
                >ZAP</Code>
		</D_9013>
	</C_C556>
</S_STS>
<S_STS
            Name="Status der Antwort"
            Number="00036"
            AHB_Status="Muss [2061]"
          >
	<C_C601 Name="Statuskategorie">
		<D_9015 Name="Statuskategorie, Code">
			<Code
                  Name="Status der Antwort"
                  Description=""
                  AHB_Status="X"
                >E01</Code>
		</D_9015>
	</C_C601>
	<C_C556 Name="Statusanlaß">
		<D_9013 Name="Code des Prüfschritts" AHB_Status="X [360]" />
		<D_1131 Name="Codeliste, Code">
			<Code
                  Name="EBD Nr. E_0623"
                  Description=""
                  AHB_Status="X"
                >E_0623</Code>
		</D_1131>
	</C_C556>
</S_STS>
```
The E01/E03 that users are reporting to be missing is not in the raw data at all; just a single E01 in segment number 00035, not multiple.

Einmal mit Profis arbeiten. Wofür zahlen wir nochmal?

Hochfrequenz/ahb-tabellen#601
Hochfrequenz/ahb-tabellen#621
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant