fix: update blur function to match other samples

[glasnt]

Description

Fixes #13279

Updates sample to use the Wand equivalent to -blur 0x8, to match other samples.

Potential root cause comment in thread.

Checklist

• Please merge this PR for me once it is approved

[gemini-code-assist]

Hello @glasnt, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request addresses issue #13292 by updating the blur function in the imagemagick samples to align with other samples. Specifically, it modifies the image.resize call to image.blur with a radius of 0 and a sigma of 16, effectively replicating the -blur 0x8 ImageMagick command. The changes are applied to both functions/imagemagick/main.py and functions/v2/imagemagick/main.py.

Highlights

• Bug Fix: Addresses issue chore(cloudrun): refactor to sample 'cloudrun_service_to_service_receive' and its test #13292 to ensure consistency in blur implementation across samples.
• Code Alignment: Updates the blur function to use image.blur(radius=0, sigma=16) to match the -blur 0x8 ImageMagick command.
• Consistency: Ensures that the imagemagick samples are consistent in their blur implementation.

Changelog

• functions/imagemagick/main.py
  • Replaced image.resize(*image.size, blur=16, filter="hamming") with image.blur(radius=0, sigma=16) to match other samples.
• functions/v2/imagemagick/main.py
  • Replaced image.resize(*image.size, blur=16, filter="hamming") with image.blur(radius=0, sigma=16) to match other samples.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

---

A blur command, refined with care,
Consistency, beyond compare.
Sigma and radius set,
A clearer image, we bet,
With Wand's magic, beyond all snare.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

The pull request updates the blur function in two files to use image.blur(radius=0, sigma=16) instead of image.resize(*image.size, blur=16, filter="hamming"). This change aims to align the blur implementation with other samples. The changes look good overall.

Merge Readiness

The code changes appear to be correct and address the issue described in the pull request description. I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging. Given the changes are straightforward and address a specific issue, the pull request seems ready to be merged.

[briandorsey]

LGTM