Add support for Elasticsearch 9.0 #2343
Merged
+3
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nikulinivan
approved these changes
Jun 4, 2025
|
@liferoad tagging you as you seem to be the most active approver, this PR enables compatibility with Elasticsearch 9.0, any chance you can help us getting it merged? thanks |
|
@akashthawaitcc tagging you also in case you can also help. TIA. |
liferoad
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2025
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #2324
Reading though changelog I didn't spot any changes that should affect the client
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elastic-stack/9.0/release-notes-elasticsearch-9.0.0.html#breaking-changes-9.0-beta1
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elastic-stack/9.0/release-notes-elasticsearch-9.0.0.html
I did a smoke test by spinning up a dataflow job writing some data to an ES 9.0 cluster, and it works well. I didn't try it as a source though.