Skip to content

replaced property gcpPubsubTopic with gcpPubsubTopicPrefix #170

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

skumarlabs
Copy link

Replaced property name gcpPubsubTopic with gcpPubsubTopicPrefix in DataflowTemplates/v2/cdc-parent/cdc-embedded-connector/src/main/resources/dataflow_cdc.properties

Fixes the PubSub topic name being null as App.java was not able to get gcpPubsubTopicPrefix value

Replaced property name gcpPubsubTopic with gcpPubsubTopicPrefix. 
Fixes the PubSub topic name being null as App.java was not able to get gcpPubsubTopicPrefix value
@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Sep 17, 2020

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project (if not, look below for help). Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed (or fixed any issues), please reply here with @googlebot I signed it! and we'll verify it.


What to do if you already signed the CLA

Individual signers
Corporate signers

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: no The PR submitter does not have a CLA label Sep 17, 2020
@skumarlabs
Copy link
Author

@googlebot I signed it!

@google-cla google-cla bot added cla: yes The PR submitter has a CLA and removed cla: no The PR submitter does not have a CLA labels Sep 17, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 1, 2020

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the obsolete The PR hasn't had activity in 45 days label Nov 1, 2020
@stale stale bot closed this Nov 9, 2020
@pabloem pabloem reopened this Nov 10, 2020
@stale stale bot removed the obsolete The PR hasn't had activity in 45 days label Nov 10, 2020
@pabloem
Copy link
Contributor

pabloem commented Nov 10, 2020

I'm sorry I missed this. This LGTM.

@pabloem pabloem added the Google LGTM Approval of a pull request to be merged into the repository label Nov 10, 2020
@skumarlabs
Copy link
Author

skumarlabs commented Nov 11, 2020

I'm sorry I missed this. This LGTM.

Never mind. The issue was fixed in a later commit.

@prathapreddy123 prathapreddy123 removed the Google LGTM Approval of a pull request to be merged into the repository label Dec 3, 2020
@prathapreddy123
Copy link
Contributor

@skumarlabs - Can you rebase to latest master version and resubmit the PR

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 19, 2021

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the obsolete The PR hasn't had activity in 45 days label Jan 19, 2021
@prathapreddy123
Copy link
Contributor

@skumarlabs - Can you rebase this branch to latest master?

@prathapreddy123 prathapreddy123 self-requested a review January 21, 2021 20:13
@stale stale bot removed the obsolete The PR hasn't had activity in 45 days label Jan 21, 2021
@skumarlabs
Copy link
Author

@prathapreddy123 done.

@prathapreddy123 prathapreddy123 added the Google LGTM Approval of a pull request to be merged into the repository label Jan 30, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 11, 2021

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the obsolete The PR hasn't had activity in 45 days label Jun 11, 2021
@stale stale bot closed this Jul 21, 2021
asthamohta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2025
* Wide Row IT for Forward Migration (#170)

* Added Missing Datastream Private Connectivity

* Review comments fixes (#176)

* Move to generic to Base Class

* Rename method

* Moved Spanner Check to base class

* Added Ignore For 5000 Tables

* FM code Refactored (#188)

* Added FM Low Priority WIde Row Fixws

* Added Code Refectored

* Code Refecoting Fixes

* removed 5K table test

fix compilation error

* revert changes

* Added IT PR Stuck Fixes and Ignore 100MB test as it is holding our Pipeline

* removed 100MB flaky test

---------

Co-authored-by: taherkl <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Akash Thawait <[email protected]>
ron-gal pushed a commit to ron-gal/DataflowTemplates that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
* Wide Row IT for Forward Migration (GoogleCloudPlatform#170)

* Added Missing Datastream Private Connectivity

* Review comments fixes (GoogleCloudPlatform#176)

* Move to generic to Base Class

* Rename method

* Moved Spanner Check to base class

* Added Ignore For 5000 Tables

* FM code Refactored (GoogleCloudPlatform#188)

* Added FM Low Priority WIde Row Fixws

* Added Code Refectored

* Code Refecoting Fixes

* removed 5K table test

fix compilation error

* revert changes

* Added IT PR Stuck Fixes and Ignore 100MB test as it is holding our Pipeline

* removed 100MB flaky test

---------

Co-authored-by: taherkl <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Akash Thawait <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes The PR submitter has a CLA Google LGTM Approval of a pull request to be merged into the repository obsolete The PR hasn't had activity in 45 days size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants