-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
Use new AuthenticatePusher NewDot Optimized API commands #9659
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ function validateEmail(accountID, validateCode) { | |
// subscribe to a bunch of channels at once we will only reauthenticate and force reconnect Pusher once. | ||
const reauthenticatePusher = _.throttle(() => { | ||
Log.info('[Pusher] Re-authenticating and then reconnecting'); | ||
Authentication.reauthenticate('Push_Authenticate') | ||
Authentication.reauthenticate('AuthenticatePusher') | ||
.then(Pusher.reconnect) | ||
.catch(() => { | ||
console.debug( | ||
|
@@ -459,39 +459,39 @@ const reauthenticatePusher = _.throttle(() => { | |
function authenticatePusher(socketID, channelName, callback) { | ||
Log.info('[PusherAuthorizer] Attempting to authorize Pusher', false, {channelName}); | ||
|
||
DeprecatedAPI.Push_Authenticate({ | ||
// We use makeRequestWithSideEffects here because we need to authorize to Pusher (an external service) each time a user connects to any channel. | ||
// eslint-disable-next-line rulesdir/no-api-side-effects-method | ||
API.makeRequestWithSideEffects('AuthenticatePusher', { | ||
socket_id: socketID, | ||
channel_name: channelName, | ||
shouldRetry: false, | ||
forceNetworkRequest: true, | ||
}) | ||
.then((response) => { | ||
if (response.jsonCode === CONST.JSON_CODE.NOT_AUTHENTICATED) { | ||
Log.hmmm('[PusherAuthorizer] Unable to authenticate Pusher because authToken is expired'); | ||
callback(new Error('Pusher failed to authenticate because authToken is expired'), {auth: ''}); | ||
}).then((response) => { | ||
if (response.jsonCode === CONST.JSON_CODE.NOT_AUTHENTICATED) { | ||
Log.hmmm('[PusherAuthorizer] Unable to authenticate Pusher because authToken is expired'); | ||
callback(new Error('Pusher failed to authenticate because authToken is expired'), {auth: ''}); | ||
|
||
// Attempt to refresh the authToken then reconnect to Pusher | ||
reauthenticatePusher(); | ||
marcaaron marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
return; | ||
} | ||
// Attempt to refresh the authToken then reconnect to Pusher | ||
reauthenticatePusher(); | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (response.jsonCode !== CONST.JSON_CODE.SUCCESS) { | ||
Log.hmmm('[PusherAuthorizer] Unable to authenticate Pusher for reason other than expired session'); | ||
callback(new Error(`Pusher failed to authenticate because code: ${response.jsonCode} message: ${response.message}`), {auth: ''}); | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
if (response.jsonCode !== CONST.JSON_CODE.SUCCESS) { | ||
Log.hmmm('[PusherAuthorizer] Unable to authenticate Pusher for reason other than expired session'); | ||
callback(new Error(`Pusher failed to authenticate because code: ${response.jsonCode} message: ${response.message}`), {auth: ''}); | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
|
||
Log.info( | ||
'[PusherAuthorizer] Pusher authenticated successfully', | ||
false, | ||
{channelName}, | ||
); | ||
callback(null, response); | ||
}) | ||
.catch((error) => { | ||
Log.hmmm('[PusherAuthorizer] Unhandled error: ', {channelName, error}); | ||
callback(new Error('Push_Authenticate request failed'), {auth: ''}); | ||
}); | ||
Log.info( | ||
'[PusherAuthorizer] Pusher authenticated successfully', | ||
false, | ||
{channelName}, | ||
); | ||
callback(null, response); | ||
}).catch((error) => { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same here. Change was not really needed. |
||
Log.hmmm('[PusherAuthorizer] Unhandled error: ', {channelName, error}); | ||
callback(new Error('AuthenticatePusher request failed'), {auth: ''}); | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nonblocking fussy observation: if we just leave this indent alone the diff will leave less of an impact
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the new way is better for style but yeah
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I prefer
.then()
on a new line, but it is a personal preference and not something we have in the style guide.