-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
refactor shareTrackedExpense function #54650
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
neil-marcellini
merged 7 commits into
Expensify:main
from
ChavdaSachin:refactor/IOU.shareTrackedExpense
Jan 21, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0573785
refactor shareTrackedExpense function
ChavdaSachin 3888e81
Delete accidentally added file
ChavdaSachin c7f830a
Delete accidentally added file
ChavdaSachin df6460e
Delete accidentally added file
ChavdaSachin ad9034a
Delete accidentally added file
ChavdaSachin bf6cdd4
Merge Main
ChavdaSachin e9de5d8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/refactor/IOU.shareTrackedExpense…
ChavdaSachin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we please remove the default IDs and follow the TS guidelines regarding defaulting IDs? Or does that create way too many unrelated changes. If so, let's make sure we have an issue tracking that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would remove those default IDs and then verify the BE response.
Would go through the GH convo when these IDs were added.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I assume you're saying that you will do those things? Here are the guidelines to follow. I don't think you really need to look at the BE response.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh, I was unaware this new guidelines. I sort of miss interpreted your suggestion here.
But now it is super clear, Thank you.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When trying to implement those default IDs, one thing leads to another and it keeps going and those will be too many changes unrelated to this PR. So I think it's better to have separate GH for implementing those default IDs throughout the file - might take a few PRs.
Merge conflict is resolved, Ready for merge.