-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
fix: prevent tool tip from filling container #35735
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@sobitneupane Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
@sobitneupane when you have time, could you review the PR please? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @aswin-s. But I don't think it's good idea to use Text component as layout container. Let's not go with the workaround.
I believe we should go back to the initial issue. Let's revert the change and try to solve the initial issue.
@sobitneupane Root cause and the fix is correct. What happened with ToolTip is something very specific to Web. Tooltip is an immediate child of the container where An alternative approach would be to use styles.alignItemsStrech only on native as the issue is present only on native. We could introduce an const platform = getPlatform();
const isNative = platform === CONST.PLATFORM.IOS || platform === CONST.PLATFORM.ANDROID; Or we could create a separate |
@aswin-s We cannot introduce platform specific code in UserListItem. But if it is the only solution, we can add something similar to src/styles/utils/italic or src/styles/utils/wordbreak. |
@sobitneupane Moved container styles into platform specific files. We cannot make it as generic like |
Thanks for the update @aswin-s. Can you please retest in Web and Native and re-upload the screen recordings since we totally changed the approach. |
@sobitneupane Updated the screengrabs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewer Checklist
- I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issues
section above - I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Tests
section - I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA steps
section - I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
- If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReport
and notonIconClick
). - I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g.
myBool && <MyComponent />
. - I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*
files and using the translation method - I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copy
label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md
) were followed
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar
, I verified the components usingAvatar
have been tested & I retested again) - I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
this
properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}
the methodthis.submit
should be bound tothis
in the constructor) - Any internal methods bound to
this
are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);
ifthis.submit
is never passed to a component event handler likeonClick
) - All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG
)
- If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
- If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avatar
is modified, I verified thatAvatar
is working as expected in all cases) - If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
- If the PR modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added
Design
label so the design team can review the changes.
- If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollView
component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - If the
main
branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTest
steps. - I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
@roryabraham would you like to review the PR as you also reviewed the proposal? I don't know why melvin assigned me 🤔 |
@aswin-s Looks like we've got a merge conflict here. Mind taking a look and resolving it? |
@sobitneupane Merged master. However |
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | |||
import type GetContextMenuItemStyle from './types'; | |||
|
|||
const getUserListItemStyles: GetContextMenuItemStyle = (styles) => [styles.flex1, styles.flexColumn, styles.justifyContentCenter, styles.alignItemsStretch, styles.optionRow]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we create a baseStyles.ts
file with all the common styles to make it clear what's different between web and mobile. I think in general we have developed too big an appetite for platform differences in our codebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So I mentioned on the issue that I'm unable to get tooltips to show up at all, and as such the test steps on this PR are not passing.
But assuming that whatever other regression is causing that is fixed, I'd like to see us take another approach that doesn't require platform fragmentation.
Maybe just add a style prop to the tooltip component so that we can optionally make it align with its container's start rather than its center.
Details
This PR fixes a regression from #33542 where tooltip was misaligned.
Reason for regression:
For fixing layout issue on Android where Text component was not taking full available width,
alignItems: 'stretch'
was applied to parent container in UserListItem component. However on web this caused ToolTip component to fill the parent container instead of wrapping its child text content.To fix this issue, the ToolTip element in UserList item is wrapped in another Text tag so that ToolTip will not inherit any flex properties from its parent flex container. This fixes the regression that occured on Web platform.
Fixed Issues
$ #35691
PROPOSAL: #35691 (comment)
Tests
Offline tests
QA Steps
PR Author Checklist
### Fixed Issues
section aboveTests
sectionOffline steps
sectionQA steps
sectiontoggleReport
and notonIconClick
)myBool && <MyComponent />
.src/languages/*
files and using the translation methodWaiting for Copy
label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.STYLE.md
) were followedAvatar
, I verified the components usingAvatar
are working as expected)StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
)Avatar
is modified, I verified thatAvatar
is working as expected in all cases)Design
label so the design team can review the changes.ScrollView
component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.main
branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTest
steps.Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
android_out.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android_web_out.mp4
iOS: Native
ios_out.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios-mweb_out.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web_out.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
desktop_out.mp4