[Change Report] Expense - Report name in Report field shows negative amount in offline mode

[mitarachim]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: 9.1.28-1
Reproducible in staging?: Yes
Reproducible in production?: Unable to check
If this was caught on HybridApp, is this reproducible on New Expensify Standalone?: No, reproducible on hybrid only
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: Exp
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): [email protected]
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team
Device used: Mac 15.3 / Chrome
App Component: Money Requests

Action Performed:

1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
2. Go offline.
3. Create a new workspace.
4. Go to workspace chat.
5. Submit an expense.
6. Go to transaction thread.

Expected Result:

The report name in Report field should not have negative amount.

Actual Result:

The report name in Report field shows negative amount.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

• Android: Standalone
• Android: HybridApp
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: Standalone
• iOS: HybridApp
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Bug6802412_1744697851920.20250415_141412.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Issue Owner

Current Issue Owner: @waterim

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @joekaufmanexpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @mountiny (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

[melvin-bot]

💬 A slack conversation has been started in #expensify-open-source

[github-actions]

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
3. Fix the issue yourself.

[mountiny]

@waterim @rayane-d @DylanDylann can you please have a look at this one? I will demote as its all offline and minor

[rayane-d]

Discussing in https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1744712146580769

[joekaufmanexpensify]

Seems like we're making a plan for this above. Let me know if I can help!

[luacmartins]

We'll put this button behind a beta and tackle the issue as a follow up.

[joekaufmanexpensify]

Sounds great, thank you!

[melvin-bot]

@waterim Eep! 4 days overdue now. Issues have feelings too...

[joekaufmanexpensify]

PR is WIP

[joekaufmanexpensify]

@waterim is there an ETA to have a PR in review here?

[waterim]

Hey, this one is fixed already and will be opened tomorrow, my draft contains more than one bug and takes a bit longer

[luacmartins]

Thanks @waterim! We can do one PR per issue if that speeds things up. I think that makes it easier on reviewers too, since it's just one case to test

[joekaufmanexpensify]

Thanks for the update!

[joekaufmanexpensify]

PR merged

[luacmartins]

This is fixed in staging. Gonna close it out.