[Due for payment 2025-03-21] [Navigation] iOS- App returns to Inbox instead of workspace settings when WS chat is accessed from settings

[IuliiaHerets]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: 9.0.98-0
Reproducible in staging?: Yes
Reproducible in production?: No
If this was caught on HybridApp, is this reproducible on New Expensify Standalone?: Yes, reproducible on both
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: Exp
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): [email protected]
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team
Device used: iPhone 15 Pro Max / iOS 18.3
App Component: Workspace Settings

Action Performed:

1. Launch ND or hybrid app.
2. Go to workspace settings.
3. Tap on the workspace chat.
4. Swipe to the right to return to previous page.
5. Swipe to the right again on Inbox.

Expected Result:

In Step 4, app will return to the previous page which is workspace settings.

Actual Result:

In Step 4, app returns to Inbox instead of workspace settings.
In Step 5, user can swipe right on Inbox to return to workspace settings.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

• Android: Standalone
• Android: HybridApp
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: Standalone
• iOS: HybridApp
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Bug6741400_1739411705127.ScreenRecording_02-13-2025_09-46-42_1.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Issue Owner

Current Issue Owner: @johncschuster

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @johncschuster (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @nkuoch (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

[melvin-bot]

💬 A slack conversation has been started in #expensify-open-source

[github-actions]

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
3. Fix the issue yourself.

[mountiny]

Demoted as this is not a blocker, the behaviour needs to be discussed as I feel like it might be expected

[WojtekBoman]

Hey, I'm going to work on that :)

[melvin-bot]

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

[WojtekBoman]

Here's a new PR

[shubham1206agra]

@mountiny Please assign me this issue as reviewer

[melvin-bot]

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.1.12-7 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• Adjust adaptStateIfNecessary to push a split navigator without a sidebar screen v2 #57753

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2025-03-21. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @WojtekBoman does not require payment (Contractor)
• @shubham1206agra requires payment through NewDot Manual Requests

[melvin-bot]

@shubham1206agra @johncschuster @shubham1206agra The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[johncschuster]

BugZero Checklist:

• [Contributor] Classify the bug:

Bug classification

Source of bug:

• 1a. Result of the original design (eg. a case wasn't considered)
• 1b. Mistake during implementation
• 1c. Backend bug
• 1z. Other:

Where bug was reported:

• 2a. Reported on production (eg. bug slipped through the normal regression and PR testing process on staging)
• 2b. Reported on staging (eg. found during regression or PR testing)
• 2d. Reported on a PR
• 2z. Other:

Who reported the bug:

• 3a. Expensify user
• 3b. Expensify employee
• 3c. Contributor
• 3d. QA
• 3z. Other:

• [Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.

  Link to comment:

• [Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.

  Link to discussion:

• [Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.

Regression Test Proposal Template

• [BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.

  Link to issue:

Regression Test Proposal

Precondition:

Test:

Do we agree 👍 or 👎

[mountiny]

$250 to @shubham1206agra

[johncschuster]

Payment Summary

Contributor: @WojtekBoman does not require payment
Contributor+: @shubham1206agra owed $250 via NewDot (due after regression hold period on 2025-03-21)

@shubham1206agra please complete the BZ Checklist above and then request payment via ND! Thanks!

[melvin-bot]

Payment Summary

Upwork Job

• Contributor: @WojtekBoman is from an agency-contributor and not due payment
• Reviewer: @shubham1206agra owed $250 via NewDot

BugZero Checklist (@johncschuster)

• I have verified the correct assignees and roles are listed above and updated the necessary manual offers
• I have verified that there are no duplicate or incorrect contracts on Upwork for this job (https://www.upwork.com/ab/applicants//hired)
• I have paid out the Upwork contracts or cancelled the ones that are incorrect
• I have verified the payment summary above is correct

[johncschuster]

@shubham1206agra friendly bump on the BZ Checklist above 🙏

[johncschuster]

Bumped in Slack

[shubham1206agra]

BugZero Checklist:

• [Contributor] Classify the bug:

Bug classification

Source of bug:

• 1a. Result of the original design (eg. a case wasn't considered)
• 1b. Mistake during implementation
• 1c. Backend bug
• 1z. Other:

Where bug was reported:

• 2a. Reported on production (eg. bug slipped through the normal regression and PR testing process on staging)
• 2b. Reported on staging (eg. found during regression or PR testing)
• 2d. Reported on a PR
• 2z. Other:

Who reported the bug:

• 3a. Expensify user
• 3b. Expensify employee
• 3c. Contributor
• 3d. QA
• 3z. Other:

• [Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.

  Link to comment: https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/49539/files#r2018006904

• [Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.

  Link to discussion: Not Required

• [Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.

• [BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.

  Link to issue:

Regression Test Proposal

Test:

No Tests are required here as the related test is already present in the test suite.

Do we agree 👍 or 👎

[johncschuster]

Thanks, @shubham1206agra! Go ahead and request payment in NewDot! (summary here)

[garrettmknight]

$250 approved for @shubham1206agra