-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
Closed
Labels
4 - verifiedIssues that have been tested, confirmed as mitigated, and are ready to close.Issues that have been tested, confirmed as mitigated, and are ready to close.ArcGIS Field AppsIssues logged by ArcGIS Field Apps team members.Issues logged by ArcGIS Field Apps team members.bugBug reports for broken functionality. Issues should include a reproduction of the bug.Bug reports for broken functionality. Issues should include a reproduction of the bug.calcite-componentsIssues specific to the @esri/calcite-components package.Issues specific to the @esri/calcite-components package.designIssues that need design consultation prior to, or during, development.Issues that need design consultation prior to, or during, development.estimate - 2Small fix or update, may require updates to tests.Small fix or update, may require updates to tests.estimate - design - smSmall design effort; 1-4 days of design workSmall design effort; 1-4 days of design workimpact - p2 - want for an upcoming milestoneUser set priority impact status of p2 - want for an upcoming milestoneUser set priority impact status of p2 - want for an upcoming milestonep - mediumIssue is non core or affecting less that 60% of people using the libraryIssue is non core or affecting less that 60% of people using the libraryready for devIssues ready for development implementation.Issues ready for development implementation.
Milestone
Description
Check existing issues
- I have checked for existing issues to avoid duplicates
Actual Behavior
The disabled state for a text-area
element is very low contrast and inconsistent with the disabled state of the other input components.
Expected Behavior
I was expecting the colors used in the text-area's disabled state to match the colors used in the inputs' disabled state.
Reproduction Sample
https://codepen.io/nwhittaker-esri/pen/ZEwwwMy
Reproduction Steps
Visit the repro. and visually compare the disabled components.
Reproduction Version
2.0.0
Relevant Info
Inspecting the calcite-text-area
component, it looks like a 0.5
opacity is getting doubly applied. Once to the :host
and once to the :host textarea
element.
Regression?
No response
Priority impact
p3 - want for upcoming milestone
Impact
No response
Calcite package
- @esri/calcite-components
- @esri/calcite-components-angular
- @esri/calcite-components-react
- @esri/calcite-design-tokens
- @esri/eslint-plugin-calcite-components
Esri team
ArcGIS Field Apps
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
4 - verifiedIssues that have been tested, confirmed as mitigated, and are ready to close.Issues that have been tested, confirmed as mitigated, and are ready to close.ArcGIS Field AppsIssues logged by ArcGIS Field Apps team members.Issues logged by ArcGIS Field Apps team members.bugBug reports for broken functionality. Issues should include a reproduction of the bug.Bug reports for broken functionality. Issues should include a reproduction of the bug.calcite-componentsIssues specific to the @esri/calcite-components package.Issues specific to the @esri/calcite-components package.designIssues that need design consultation prior to, or during, development.Issues that need design consultation prior to, or during, development.estimate - 2Small fix or update, may require updates to tests.Small fix or update, may require updates to tests.estimate - design - smSmall design effort; 1-4 days of design workSmall design effort; 1-4 days of design workimpact - p2 - want for an upcoming milestoneUser set priority impact status of p2 - want for an upcoming milestoneUser set priority impact status of p2 - want for an upcoming milestonep - mediumIssue is non core or affecting less that 60% of people using the libraryIssue is non core or affecting less that 60% of people using the libraryready for devIssues ready for development implementation.Issues ready for development implementation.