Skip to content

fix(ci): add missing working-dir to stable release GitHub action #1146

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2025

Conversation

douenergy
Copy link
Contributor

@douenergy douenergy commented Apr 10, 2025

add missing working-dir to maven prepare

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the automated release process to execute preparation tasks within a more controlled context, improving consistency and reliability in our build pipeline.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 10, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This change updates the GitHub Actions workflow by adding a new working-directory specification for the "Maven Prepare Release" step. With this update, Maven commands in that step are executed within the wren-core-legacy directory, ensuring that the proper context is used during release preparation. No modifications have been made to command logic or public entity declarations.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/.../stable-release.yml Added working-directory: wren-core-legacy to the "Maven Prepare Release" step in the workflow.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Runner as GitHub Actions Runner
    participant MavenStep as Maven Prepare Release Step
    participant Dir as wren-core-legacy
    Runner->>MavenStep: Trigger step execution
    MavenStep->>Dir: Set working directory context
    MavenStep->>Runner: Execute Maven commands
Loading

Poem

🐇 In the code burrow I hopped with delight,
Now in wren-core-legacy, everything’s just right.
Maven commands dance in a brand new space,
With a workflow update setting a steady pace.
Hoppy commits and bouncy bytes, a rabbit’s coding night!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f7bc9e5 and db01246.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/stable-release.yml (1 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ci label Apr 10, 2025
@goldmedal goldmedal merged commit ab9370f into Canner:main Apr 10, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants