Skip to content

DM-6473: Fixes mostly related to image view of the meta data via table #136

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2016

Conversation

robyww
Copy link
Contributor

@robyww robyww commented Aug 4, 2016

  • images cannot be remove, but in expanded mode, it can.
  • plot group fails are not failing correctly, no message shown
  • When a non-meta table is selected, images are shown, but not the toolbar.
  • After table is removed, images are still there and other problem with removing tables.
  • Firefly viewer uses 'triViewImages’ viewer_id while api has no viewer_id. as a result, images loaded by api will be lost once table or other searched data are returned. (I think this is fixed, but I may not understand it)
  • Catalog or Grid overlay are drawn outside of the images.

…meta data via table

 - images cannot be remove, but in expanded mode, it can.
 - plot group fails are not failing correctly, no message shown
 - When a non-meta table is selected, images are shown, but not the toolbar.
 - After table is removed, images are still there.
 - Firefly viewer uses 'triViewImages’ viewer_id while api has no viewer_id. as a result, images loaded by api will be lost once table or other searched data are returned. (I think this is fixed, but I may not understand it)
 - Catalog or Grid overlay are drawn outside of the images.
@loitly
Copy link
Contributor

loitly commented Aug 5, 2016

Review completed without any issues.
I noticed a 1 pixel gap between the image viewer's tab and its content.
It also appears in dev, so I am sure it's not caused by this pull request.

@robyww robyww merged commit aa84424 into dev Aug 5, 2016
@robyww robyww deleted the dm-6473-meta-data-bugs branch August 5, 2016 17:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants