Skip to content

Lut max z #34

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Lut max z #34

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

12tbuchman
Copy link
Contributor

@12tbuchman 12tbuchman commented Mar 27, 2025

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Contributor

@bobhenz-jabil bobhenz-jabil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r1, 5 of 5 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @12tbuchman)


cfg/AMCL.cfg line 106 at r2 (raw file):

gen.add("publish_distances_lut", bool_t, 0, "Whether to publish the Distances Lookup Table as a point cloud for debugging.", False)
gen.add("lut_max_z", double_t, 0, "Add octopmap objects to the lookup table only if they have a z height below this value.", 10.0, 0.0, 10.0)

I recommend making the max be some ridiculously large value like 100.0 (just like you have the min a ridiculously small value).

Dynamic reconfigure has become overly complex despite being unused. To
simplify, remove any parameters that would require re-initializing an
object to use. If these parameters need to be changed it should be done
through salt.
Lowering the max z of the lookup table helps reduce the impact of drop
ceilings.
Copy link
Contributor Author

@12tbuchman 12tbuchman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 1 of 7 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @bobhenz-jabil)


cfg/AMCL.cfg line 106 at r2 (raw file):

Previously, bobhenz-jabil (Bob Henz) wrote…

I recommend making the max be some ridiculously large value like 100.0 (just like you have the min a ridiculously small value).

removed from cfg file entirely

Copy link
Contributor

@bobhenz-jabil bobhenz-jabil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 6 of 6 files at r3, 4 of 4 files at r4, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @12tbuchman)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants