Translucent panel

[robinflyman]

Closes #182

[RMildiner]

Tested the GEM file creation using a GH script and then imported the GEM into IES. The translucent shade component appeared in the correct place and was recognised as translucent by IES straight away. Seems to work.

[jamesramsden-bh]

Pushing to IES: Pass. Confirmed with @RMildiner that a pushed model opens in IES correctly.

Pulling to IES: Fail. The 'opening' within the shade is offset by a vector of approximately 8m,8m,8m. This issue is not evident when using a non-translucent shade. (Test GEM files for translucent and non-translucent within the zip file attached.)
translucent push and pull tests.zip

[jamesramsden-bh]

Fail from previous comment now fixed. @FraserGreenroyd now ready for review.
@robinflyman no action needed from you right now.

[bhombot-ci]

@robinflyman just to let you know, I have provided a check-versioning result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @FraserGreenroyd on BHoM_Engine

[FraserGreenroyd]

@BHoMBot check core

[bhombot-ci]

@FraserGreenroyd to confirm, the following checks are now queued:

• core

[FraserGreenroyd]

@BHoMBot check versioning

[bhombot-ci]

@FraserGreenroyd to confirm, the following checks are now queued:

• versioning

[jamesramsden-bh]

Tested against translucent shading sections of testing procedure, LGTM.

[FraserGreenroyd]

@BHoMBot check installer

[bhombot-ci]

@FraserGreenroyd to confirm, the following checks are now queued:

• installer

[FraserGreenroyd]

@BHoMBot check required

[bhombot-ci]

@FraserGreenroyd to confirm, the following checks are now queued:

• code-compliance
• documentation-compliance
• project-compliance
• core
• null-handling
• serialisation
• versioning
• installer

[bhombot-ci]

The check versioning has already been run previously and recorded as a successful check. This check has not been run again at this time.

[bhombot-ci]

The check installer has already been run previously and recorded as a successful check. This check has not been run again at this time.

[FraserGreenroyd]

@BHoMBot check copyright-compliance

[bhombot-ci]

@FraserGreenroyd to confirm, the following checks are now queued:

• copyright-compliance

[bhombot-ci]

FAO: @FraserGreenroyd
@FraserGreenroyd is seeking dispensation on this Pull Request to skip a required check. Please can you provide authorisation for the check to be skipped, or provide assistance as appropriate.

The check they wish to have dispensation on is documentation-compliance.

If you are providing dispensation on this occasion, please reply with:

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 5199266217

[bhombot-ci]

FAO: @FraserGreenroyd
@FraserGreenroyd is seeking dispensation on this Pull Request to skip a required check. Please can you provide authorisation for the check to be skipped, or provide assistance as appropriate.

The check they wish to have dispensation on is null-handling.

If you are providing dispensation on this occasion, please reply with:

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 5199267343

[FraserGreenroyd]

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 5199266217

[bhombot-ci]

@FraserGreenroyd I have now provided a passing check on reference 5199266217 as requested.

[FraserGreenroyd]

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 5199267343

[bhombot-ci]

@FraserGreenroyd I have now provided a passing check on reference 5199267343 as requested.

[FraserGreenroyd]

Tested through on test procedure by others, code reviewed by me, updates required to engine have been implemented and are working happily. Versioning and installer checks are happy, so deploying to alpha for further testing.