-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
[action] [PR:21478] [Mellanox] Support running hw-management service on SN5640 emulation platform #550
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…platform <!-- Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines: https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md ** Make sure all your commits include a signature generated with `git commit -s` ** If this is a bug fix, make sure your description includes "fixes #xxxx", or "closes #xxxx" or "resolves #xxxx" Please provide the following information: --> #### Why I did it Support running hw-management service on SN5640 emulation platform. ##### Work item tracking - Microsoft ADO **(number only)**: #### How I did it - Use physical EEPROM instead of the fake one - Do not skip PSUd, PCId, thermal control daemon - Adjust PCIe and thermal configuration files #### How to verify it Run Nvidia simulation on SN5640 (ASIC and Platform) <!-- If PR needs to be backported, then the PR must be tested against the base branch and the earliest backport release branch and provide tested image version on these two branches. For example, if the PR is requested for master, 202211 and 202012, then the requester needs to provide test results on master and 202012. --> #### Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected) <!-- - Note we only backport fixes to a release branch, *not* features! - Please also provide a reason for the backporting below. - e.g. - [x] 202006 --> - [ ] 201811 - [ ] 201911 - [ ] 202006 - [ ] 202012 - [ ] 202106 - [ ] 202111 - [ ] 202205 - [ ] 202211 - [ ] 202305 #### Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version) <!-- - Please provide tested image version - e.g. - [x] 20201231.100 --> - [ ] <!-- image version 1 --> - [ ] <!-- image version 2 --> #### Description for the changelog <!-- Write a short (one line) summary that describes the changes in this pull request for inclusion in the changelog: --> <!-- Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU. --> #### Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes <!-- Provide a link to config_db schema for the table for which YANG model is defined Link should point to correct section on https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/src/sonic-yang-models/doc/Configuration.md --> #### A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
Original PR: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#21478 |
/azp run |
11 tasks
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
mssonicbld
added a commit
to mssonicbld/sonic-buildimage-msft
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2025
… automatically (#21909) #### Why I did it src/sonic-platform-common ``` * f679a67 - (HEAD -> 202411, origin/202411) Restore optoe page to default 0 for active cables (Azure#550) (7 hours ago) [mssonicbld] ``` #### How I did it #### How to verify it #### Description for the changelog
mssonicbld
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
…est HEAD automatically (#1015) #### Why I did it src/sonic-platform-common ``` * 8ce4e83 - (HEAD -> 202412, origin/202412) Merge pull request #76 from r12f/code-sync-202412 (6 minutes ago) [Riff] * d151d69 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'base/202411' into code-sync-202412 (13 hours ago) [r12f] * f679a67 - Restore optoe page to default 0 for active cables (#550) (6 weeks ago) [mssonicbld] * c735073 - [202411][cmis] Fix cmis.get_error_description speed for passive module (#538) (9 weeks ago) [Aryeh Feigin] * b7e75d8 - Add 800G innolight PNs (#540) (2 months ago) [mssonicbld] ``` #### How I did it #### How to verify it #### Description for the changelog
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why I did it
Support running hw-management service on SN5640 emulation platform.
Work item tracking
How I did it
How to verify it
Run Nvidia simulation on SN5640 (ASIC and Platform)
Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)
Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)
Description for the changelog
Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)