Skip to content

[action] [PR:21478] [Mellanox] Support running hw-management service on SN5640 emulation platform #550

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Why I did it

Support running hw-management service on SN5640 emulation platform.

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

  • Use physical EEPROM instead of the fake one
  • Do not skip PSUd, PCId, thermal control daemon
  • Adjust PCIe and thermal configuration files

How to verify it

Run Nvidia simulation on SN5640 (ASIC and Platform)

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

…platform

<!--
     Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines:
     https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

     ** Make sure all your commits include a signature generated with `git commit -s` **

     If this is a bug fix, make sure your description includes "fixes #xxxx", or
     "closes #xxxx" or "resolves #xxxx"

     Please provide the following information:
-->

#### Why I did it
Support running hw-management service on SN5640 emulation platform.

##### Work item tracking
- Microsoft ADO **(number only)**:

#### How I did it
- Use physical EEPROM instead of the fake one
- Do not skip PSUd, PCId, thermal control daemon
- Adjust PCIe and thermal configuration files

#### How to verify it
Run Nvidia simulation on SN5640 (ASIC and Platform)

<!--
If PR needs to be backported, then the PR must be tested against the base branch and the earliest backport release branch and provide tested image version on these two branches. For example, if the PR is requested for master, 202211 and 202012, then the requester needs to provide test results on master and 202012.
-->

#### Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

<!--
- Note we only backport fixes to a release branch, *not* features!
- Please also provide a reason for the backporting below.
- e.g.
- [x] 202006
-->

- [ ] 201811
- [ ] 201911
- [ ] 202006
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202106
- [ ] 202111
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202211
- [ ] 202305

#### Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

<!--
- Please provide tested image version
- e.g.
- [x] 20201231.100
-->

- [ ] <!-- image version 1 -->
- [ ] <!-- image version 2 -->

#### Description for the changelog
<!--
Write a short (one line) summary that describes the changes in this
pull request for inclusion in the changelog:
-->

<!--
 Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU.
-->

#### Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
<!--
Provide a link to config_db schema for the table for which YANG model
is defined
Link should point to correct section on https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/src/sonic-yang-models/doc/Configuration.md
-->

#### A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Original PR: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#21478

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit 77b75db into Azure:202412 Jan 24, 2025
10 of 20 checks passed
mssonicbld added a commit to mssonicbld/sonic-buildimage-msft that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2025
… automatically (#21909)

#### Why I did it
src/sonic-platform-common
```
* f679a67 - (HEAD -> 202411, origin/202411) Restore optoe page to default 0 for active cables (Azure#550) (7 hours ago) [mssonicbld]
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
#### Description for the changelog
mssonicbld added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
…est HEAD automatically (#1015)

#### Why I did it
src/sonic-platform-common
```
* 8ce4e83 - (HEAD -> 202412, origin/202412) Merge pull request #76 from r12f/code-sync-202412 (6 minutes ago) [Riff]
* d151d69 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'base/202411' into code-sync-202412 (13 hours ago) [r12f]
* f679a67 - Restore optoe page to default 0 for active cables (#550) (6 weeks ago) [mssonicbld]
* c735073 - [202411][cmis] Fix cmis.get_error_description speed for passive module (#538) (9 weeks ago) [Aryeh Feigin]
* b7e75d8 - Add 800G innolight PNs (#540) (2 months ago) [mssonicbld]
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
#### Description for the changelog
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant