Skip to content

Revert changes for loading state of magic login #102924

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 1, 2025

Conversation

grzegorz-cp
Copy link
Contributor

Reverting #102246

This reverts commit d7b83fa.

Related to ONBOARD-99

Proposed Changes

  • revert changes made to loading state for magic login due to the changes in the technical approach

Why are these changes being made?

Testing Instructions

  • create a JN site and start Jetpack connection for a user that is not logged in to wp.com
  • when redirected to wp.com apply the URL to the live branch URL for this PR
  • follow magic link login flow and verify that it works

Pre-merge Checklist

  • Has the general commit checklist been followed? (PCYsg-hS-p2)
  • Have you written new tests for your changes?
  • Have you tested the feature in Simple (P9HQHe-k8-p2), Atomic (P9HQHe-jW-p2), and self-hosted Jetpack sites (PCYsg-g6b-p2)?
  • Have you checked for TypeScript, React or other console errors?
  • Have you used memoizing on expensive computations? More info in Memoizing with create-selector and Using memoizing selectors and Our Approach to Data
  • Have we added the "[Status] String Freeze" label as soon as any new strings were ready for translation (p4TIVU-5Jq-p2)?
    • For UI changes, have we tested the change in various languages (for example, ES, PT, FR, or DE)? The length of text and words vary significantly between languages.
  • For changes affecting Jetpack: Have we added the "[Status] Needs Privacy Updates" label if this pull request changes what data or activity we track or use (p4TIVU-aUh-p2)?

@grzegorz-cp grzegorz-cp requested a review from a team April 28, 2025 05:58
@grzegorz-cp grzegorz-cp self-assigned this Apr 28, 2025
@matticbot matticbot added the [Status] Needs Review The PR is ready for review. This also triggers e2e canary tests and wp-desktop tests automatically. label Apr 28, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 28, 2025

@matticbot
Copy link
Contributor

matticbot commented Apr 28, 2025

Here is how your PR affects size of JS and CSS bundles shipped to the user's browser:

App Entrypoints (~126 bytes removed 📉 [gzipped])

name         parsed_size           gzip_size
entry-login       -564 B  (-0.0%)     -126 B  (-0.0%)

Common code that is always downloaded and parsed every time the app is loaded, no matter which route is used.

Legend

What is parsed and gzip size?

Parsed Size: Uncompressed size of the JS and CSS files. This much code needs to be parsed and stored in memory.
Gzip Size: Compressed size of the JS and CSS files. This much data needs to be downloaded over network.

Generated by performance advisor bot at iscalypsofastyet.com.

Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for working on it @grzegorz! I do believe, we also need to revert this code, that introduced ellipses in general: #102109

@grzegorz-cp
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the reminder @robertsreberski. Some parts of that PR were already reverted but I removed the rest.

Copy link
Member

@manzoorwanijk manzoorwanijk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This tests well

@grzegorz-cp grzegorz-cp merged commit 5c0eae0 into trunk May 1, 2025
14 checks passed
@grzegorz-cp grzegorz-cp deleted the update/ONBOARD-99-revert-loading-state branch May 1, 2025 23:46
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the [Status] Needs Review The PR is ready for review. This also triggers e2e canary tests and wp-desktop tests automatically. label May 1, 2025
@@ -1391,8 +1375,6 @@ class MagicLogin extends Component {
<GlobalNotices id="notices" />

<RequestLoginEmailForm { ...requestLoginEmailFormProps } />

{ ! shouldShowLoadingEllipsis && this.renderLinks() }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was the removal of this.renderLinks from here intended? The PR that this reverts only added the condition, so this change goes beyond the scope of a simple reversion.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for finding this. I added a PR to restore the link.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants