Skip to content

RDV: Force treatment on Calypso without assigning users to the experiment #102244

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 3, 2025

Conversation

rcrdortiz
Copy link
Contributor

@rcrdortiz rcrdortiz commented Mar 31, 2025

Related to:

Proposed Changes

The RDV assignment is now always treated as treatment, though no real assignments are occurring anymore. The codebase will assume the user is in the Treatment group. This change effectively enables the feature by relying on existing logic while we clean up various locations where assignment checks are currently being performed.

Why are these changes being made?

We're moving forward with removing duplicate views and we need to remove/force everyone to the treatment group.

Testing Instructions

Pre-merge Checklist

  • Has the general commit checklist been followed? (PCYsg-hS-p2)
  • Have you written new tests for your changes?
  • Have you tested the feature in Simple (P9HQHe-k8-p2), Atomic (P9HQHe-jW-p2), and self-hosted Jetpack sites (PCYsg-g6b-p2)?
  • Have you checked for TypeScript, React or other console errors?
  • Have you used memoizing on expensive computations? More info in Memoizing with create-selector and Using memoizing selectors and Our Approach to Data
  • Have we added the "[Status] String Freeze" label as soon as any new strings were ready for translation (p4TIVU-5Jq-p2)?
    • For UI changes, have we tested the change in various languages (for example, ES, PT, FR, or DE)? The length of text and words vary significantly between languages.
  • For changes affecting Jetpack: Have we added the "[Status] Needs Privacy Updates" label if this pull request changes what data or activity we track or use (p4TIVU-aUh-p2)?

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 31, 2025

@rcrdortiz rcrdortiz self-assigned this Mar 31, 2025
@rcrdortiz rcrdortiz requested a review from a team March 31, 2025 16:29
@matticbot matticbot added the [Status] Needs Review The PR is ready for review. This also triggers e2e canary tests and wp-desktop tests automatically. label Mar 31, 2025
@matticbot
Copy link
Contributor

matticbot commented Mar 31, 2025

Here is how your PR affects size of JS and CSS bundles shipped to the user's browser:

App Entrypoints (~109 bytes removed 📉 [gzipped])

name         parsed_size           gzip_size
entry-main        -343 B  (-0.0%)     -109 B  (-0.0%)
entry-login       -343 B  (-0.0%)     -109 B  (-0.0%)

Common code that is always downloaded and parsed every time the app is loaded, no matter which route is used.

Sections (~50 bytes removed 📉 [gzipped])

name           parsed_size           gzip_size
staging-site        -107 B  (-0.0%)      -25 B  (-0.0%)
site-settings       -107 B  (-0.0%)      -25 B  (-0.0%)
hosting             -107 B  (-0.0%)      -25 B  (-0.0%)

Sections contain code specific for a given set of routes. Is downloaded and parsed only when a particular route is navigated to.

Legend

What is parsed and gzip size?

Parsed Size: Uncompressed size of the JS and CSS files. This much code needs to be parsed and stored in memory.
Gzip Size: Compressed size of the JS and CSS files. This much data needs to be downloaded over network.

Generated by performance advisor bot at iscalypsofastyet.com.

@matticbot
Copy link
Contributor

matticbot commented Mar 31, 2025

This PR modifies the release build for the following Calypso Apps:

For info about this notification, see here: PCYsg-OT6-p2

  • help-center
  • notifications
  • wpcom-block-editor

To test WordPress.com changes, run install-plugin.sh $pluginSlug add/return-rdv-treatment-for-all on your sandbox.

@xavier-lc
Copy link
Contributor

xavier-lc commented Apr 2, 2025

For checking the bug...

  • Open the Live link
  • Go to {container}/sites/settings/database/{non-atomic site}
  • You should not see the database feature page and should be redirected instead.

I can see the db feature:

Nevermind, I've seen now the latest commit and the new issue.

@rcrdortiz
Copy link
Contributor Author

For checking the bug...

  • Open the Live link
  • Go to {container}/sites/settings/database/{non-atomic site}
  • You should not see the database feature page and should be redirected instead.

I can see the db feature:

Nevermind, I've seen now the latest commit and the new issue.

I've updated the PR description so that we don't include the bugfix anymore.

Copy link
Contributor

@xavier-lc xavier-lc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rcrdortiz rcrdortiz merged commit 8960c11 into trunk Apr 3, 2025
14 checks passed
@rcrdortiz rcrdortiz deleted the add/return-rdv-treatment-for-all branch April 3, 2025 07:57
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the [Status] Needs Review The PR is ready for review. This also triggers e2e canary tests and wp-desktop tests automatically. label Apr 3, 2025
JessBoctor pushed a commit to JessBoctor/wp-calypso that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2025
…ment (Automattic#102244)

* RDV: Force treatment on Calypso without assigning users to the experiment

* Fixed a bug that was causing the hosting panel to be shown even when the features were not available

* Fixed test

* Fixed tests

* Restored the bug, will file a new issue
JessBoctor pushed a commit to JessBoctor/wp-calypso that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
…ment (Automattic#102244)

* RDV: Force treatment on Calypso without assigning users to the experiment

* Fixed a bug that was causing the hosting panel to be shown even when the features were not available

* Fixed test

* Fixed tests

* Restored the bug, will file a new issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants