Skip to content

Match size by scaling #7

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
4lex4 opened this issue Jan 3, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

Match size by scaling #7

4lex4 opened this issue Jan 3, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@4lex4
Copy link
Owner

4lex4 commented Jan 3, 2018

Port this feature as part of re-basing to Experimental platform.

@4lex4 4lex4 added the feature label Jan 3, 2018
@4lex4 4lex4 self-assigned this Jan 3, 2018
@4lex4 4lex4 added this to the 1.1.0 milestone Jan 3, 2018
@konos93
Copy link

konos93 commented May 23, 2018

when and what needed to this feature to be add?

@4lex4 4lex4 removed this from the 1.1.0 milestone Jul 17, 2018
@konos93
Copy link

konos93 commented Feb 19, 2019

hello is it possible to a next version add the feature Match size by scaling in Margins . it will then have all the features of scan tailor experimental .
now command Match size with other pages is like Match size by growing margins . i prefer your version rather than experimental because output command is perfect . less size , better quality more options and more smooth the results. but i use 2 camera scanner and it is very difficult to have the same cropped sizes of odds and evens pages . Match size by scaling in Margins would correct that.

what difficulties there are to get added ?

in any case thank your for your contribution with your versions

@konos93
Copy link

konos93 commented Mar 17, 2019

here is my issue even if i can correct it with fast stone photoresizer a program i think that this should get added . personally every even page is 5% smaller than odd page

https://imgur.com/iWRYt7x
[img]https://i.imgur.com/AcTCTfS.png[/img]

fyrtax pushed a commit to fyrtax/scantailor-advanced that referenced this issue Apr 2, 2022
Support for Qt6 beside Qt5.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants