Fix dates in granularity example in Guidelines for Repository Implementers #4

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Open

zimeon opened this issue Oct 15, 2015 · 0 comments

Labels

Owner

zimeon commented Oct 15, 2015

Should do:
s/2002-03-01/2002-01-03/
s/2002-04-01/2002-01-04/

(I don't think the example should use times in all the dates because it is intended to illustrate the possible problems with day granularity.)

Might also fix author links to be ORCID links.

On 10/15/15 5:42 AM, Àlex Magaz Graça wrote:

Hello,

I'm not sure, but looks like the date format used in the example of the
OAI-PMH Implementation Guidelines [1] is YYYY-DD-MM instead of
YYYY-MM-DD. Otherwise, it looks a bit confusing. In addition, I think
having the time part in all the dates would also make it more easy to
understand.

[1] http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/guidelines-repository.htm#DatestampGranularity

Cheers,
Àlex

zimeon added bug OAI-PMH labels

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment