Skip to content

Clarify collections consistency rules #328

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
dr-shorthair opened this issue Jun 11, 2025 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #331
Open

Clarify collections consistency rules #328

dr-shorthair opened this issue Jun 11, 2025 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #331

Comments

@dr-shorthair
Copy link
Collaborator

See #326 (review)

Provide examples to illustrate each rule

@dr-shorthair
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dr-shorthair commented Jun 11, 2025

See examples for the 5 cases here: https://github.com/w3c/sdw-sosa-ssn/tree/328-collections-consistency-rules-examples/ssn/rdf/tests/ObservationCollection

Note that these are all consistent with the matching case.
A full test suite would also include examples which are inconsistent in all ways - which is a lot.

@ldesousa
Copy link
Contributor

The examples look good. The ranges expressed with the Time ontology make it clear.

If you wish to perfect further: the term property in the italics segments can be misinterpreted as actuating properties, instead of datatype/object properties.

@dr-shorthair
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants