You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm using vLLM to run the DeepSeek model with MLA architecture.
I'd like to know - ignoring matrix absorption - in the current vLLM MLA prefill implementation, whether the model parameters are reduced compared to MHA. It seems they're not, only the KV is reduced. If in this way MLA doesn't reduce model parameter size and only decreases KV cache memory usage, does it become a paradox and unnecessary in non-long-sequence scenarios?
If I've made any mistakes, I hope everyone can point them out for me. Thanks
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I'm using vLLM to run the DeepSeek model with MLA architecture.
I'd like to know - ignoring matrix absorption - in the current vLLM MLA prefill implementation, whether the model parameters are reduced compared to MHA. It seems they're not, only the KV is reduced. If in this way MLA doesn't reduce model parameter size and only decreases KV cache memory usage, does it become a paradox and unnecessary in non-long-sequence scenarios?
If I've made any mistakes, I hope everyone can point them out for me. Thanks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions