Skip to content

JOSS review: Tortuosity factor should always be greater than 1? #79

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
ma-sadeghi opened this issue Jun 28, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

JOSS review: Tortuosity factor should always be greater than 1? #79

ma-sadeghi opened this issue Jun 28, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@ma-sadeghi
Copy link

In of of the unit tests, tortuosity factor is less than 1. I was under the impression that tortuosity should always be greater than 1. Could you please explain?

def test_taue_deadend():
"""Run solver on a strip of ones, 1/4 volume of total"""
l = 100
img = np.zeros((l, l))
img[:75, 45:55] = 1
img[img != 1] = 0
esolver = tau.ElectrodeSolver(img, device=pt.device('cpu'))
esolver.solve()
assert np.around(esolver.tau_e, 3) == 0.601

@ma-sadeghi ma-sadeghi changed the title JOSS review: JOSS review: Tortuosity factor should always be greater than 1? Jun 28, 2023
@stke9
Copy link
Contributor

stke9 commented Jun 29, 2023

taue, electrode tortuosity, is not always greater than 1, please see https://www.nature.com/articles/s41524-020-00386-4. Thanks!

@stke9 stke9 closed this as completed Jun 29, 2023
@LDXu93
Copy link

LDXu93 commented Jun 29, 2023

I submitted a similar issue at #76 last week, according to the npj paper, $tau$, not $tau_e$, should be infinity for a single dead end pore, right? but I got some number smaller than 1.

@stke9
Copy link
Contributor

stke9 commented Jun 29, 2023

Hi Lex, I'm working on your issue right now (it's a problem that arose when we changed the convergence criteria), sorry have been waiting for reviews to come back!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants