add conclusions

Author: gesa

meetings/2024-10/october-08.md

@@ -1279,6 +1279,8 @@ CDA: There is nothing in the queue.
 
 BAN: Okay. I guess I would like to ask for that conditional acceptance for this one. I would like to ask for consensus and receive conditional acceptances
 
+### Conclusion
+
 CDA: Consensus for the three normative changes?
 
 CDA: Other than the conditional support signalled by my Mozilla friends, any other voices of support for normative changes?
@@ -1289,18 +1291,6 @@ CDA: All right. So it’s all riding on Mozilla now.
 
 BAN: Thank you very much. I would to say again, even though it’s kind of put me in an awkward position, I am really glad that you all are sticking to the process on this one
 
-### Speaker's Summary of Key Points
-
-- List
-- of
-- things
-
-### Conclusion
-
-- List
-- of
-- things
-
 ## Exploring an Idea of a Proposal Management and Technical Arbitration Tool
 
 Presenter: Mikhail Barash (MBH)

meetings/2024-10/october-09.md

@@ -1341,19 +1341,11 @@ JHD: Thank you, MM.
 
 RPR: + 1 from Chris.
 
-RPR: Any .… + 1 from Devon. + 1 from Chip. Do you want to speak? Chip has wanted this for years. All right. Just as to check, do we have any objections to Stage 2.7? Congratulations, JHD. You have Stage 2.7.
-
-### Speaker's Summary of Key Points
-
-- List
-- of
-- things
+RPR: Any .… + 1 from Devon. + 1 from Chip. Do you want to speak? Chip has wanted this for years. All right.
 
 ### Conclusion
 
-- List
-- of
-- things
+RPR: Just as to check, do we have any objections to Stage 2.7? Congratulations, JHD. You have Stage 2.7.
 
 ## Restricting subclassing of built-ins