Initial draft.

Author: Lichtso

proposals/0164-extend-program-checked.md

@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+---
+simd: '0164'
+title: ExtendProgramChecked loader-v3 instruction
+authors:
+  - Alexander Meißner
+category: Standard
+type: Core
+status: Review
+created: 2025-08-05
+feature: '2oMRZEDWT2tqtYMofhmmfQ8SsjqUFzT6sYXppQDavxwz'
+---
+
+## Summary
+
+Adds `ExtendProgramChecked` which is the same as `ExtendProgram`, but checks
+that the authority signed.
+
+## Motivation
+
+Currently anybody can extend (increase the size and funds of) programs, which
+they do not control (have no authority over). This has basically no effect on
+the programs as many choose to deploy with max length anyway, so tailing zeros
+are generally not an issue. Additionally, doing so requires transferring funds,
+which people rarely do for no gain. However, for the sake of consistency all
+program management instructions should require the authority to sign.
+
+## Alternatives Considered
+
+Ignoring it and waiting for loader-v4 as that does not have this issue.
+
+## New Terminology
+
+None
+
+## Detailed Design
+
+Existing instructions should not be changed (so transaction parsers remain
+stable), thus a new instruction needs to be added, similar to `SetAuthority`
+and `SetAuthorityChecked`.
+
+Adds a new instruction `ExtendProgramChecked` to loader-v3 which:
+
+- The following instruction accounts:
+  - 0. `[writable]` The program data account.
+  - 1. `[writable]` The program account.
+  - 2. `[signer]` The authority.
+  - 3. `[]` System program, optional, used to transfer lamports from the payer
+  to the ProgramData account.
+  - 4. `[signer]` The payer account, optional, that will pay necessary rent
+  exemption costs for the increased storage size.
+- The following instruction data:
+  - The enum discriminant `8`.
+  - `u32` (little endian): Number of bytes to extend the program with.
+
+`ExtendProgramChecked` behaves exactly the same as `ExtendProgram`, except
+that:
+
+- It is initially disabled. The associated feature gate must then enable
+`ExtendProgramChecked` and disable `ExtendProgram`.
+- It is available to be invoked via CPI.
+- It expects the instruction account at index 2 to be the authority and
+the two optional parameters are shifted up by one each.
+- Immediately after the check that the program is not finalized
+(which throws `Immutable`) it additionally must check (in that order) that:
+  - the provided authority matches the one stored in the program data account,
+  otherwise throwing `IncorrectAuthority`
+  - the provided authority is a signer, otherwise throwing
+  `MissingRequiredSignature`
+
+`InvalidInstructionData` must be thrown when a disabled instruction is invoked.
+
+## Impact
+
+A program is usually extended for a subsequent upgrade / redeployment which
+does require an upgrade authority anyway. Thus the additional requirement of a
+upgrade authority should not impose any new requirements on the extend-upgrade-
+workflow.
+
+For programs which do self upgrade (have their own upgrade authority) via a CPI
+call, they will have to first upgrade themselves to support the send the
+`ExtendProgramChecked` instruction, before the feature of this SIMD becomes
+active. We recommend to also add support for the loader-v3 `Migrate` (to
+loader-v4) instruction and the new loader-v4 program management instructions
+while at it.
+
+For programs which are upgraded by an external upgrade authority via the CLI,
+there should be no noticable difference for dApp developers. The CLI will check
+the active feature set and either send `ExtendProgram` or
+`ExtendProgramChecked` accordingly.
+
+Independently of which upgrade path is used, one can opt to preemptively extend
+the program to maximum size before the feature of this SIMD becomes active,
+provided they are willing to lock the required rent exemption funds.
+
+## Security Considerations
+
+None.