Skip to content

Several Potential Recombinants in China #108

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
Walde1nsamkeit opened this issue May 28, 2023 · 65 comments
Closed

Several Potential Recombinants in China #108

Walde1nsamkeit opened this issue May 28, 2023 · 65 comments

Comments

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link

Walde1nsamkeit commented May 28, 2023

Guangdong/GDCDC_GZ_0351/2023|EPI_ISL_17698183|2023-05-05
XBB.1.16.1 / FL.2.3+N:R189L
Mutations based on XBB.1.16.1: G5720A (Orf1a:G1819S, XBB.1.9), T7194T, T11750Crev, A17615G(Orf1b:K1383R, FL.2.3), T18703Grev, C22050T, G28447Arev, G28839T(N:R189L), T29386Crev

Guangdong/GDCDC_GZ_0352/2023|EPI_ISL_17698156|2023-05-05
XBB.1.16 / FL.2.3
Mutations based on XBB.1.16: T326C, G5720A (Orf1a:G1819S, XBB.1.9), T8835C (a common sequencing error in sequences uploaded by Guangzhou), T11750Crev, A17615G(Orf1b:K1383R, FL.2.3), G28447Arev

Guangdong/GDCDC_JM_0092/2023|EPI_ISL_17698225|2023-05-10
Reported by @NkRMnZr firstly.
XBB.1.9(.2?)* / FU.1+A460G(#50)
Mutations based on XBB.1.9+F486P:
A460G, T12730A (XBB.1.16), T12789Crev, G18703T (XBB.1.16), C29386T (XBB.1.16)
Since it does not contain C11956T (both contained in XBB.1.9.1 and XBB.1.16), the XBB.1.9* donor would not be XBB.1.9.1*.

Guangdong/GDCDC_FS_0044/2023|EPI_ISL_17698261|2023-05-10
Reported by @NkRMnZr firstly.
DY.3 / FL.2.3+N:R189L
Mutations based on DY.3:
T1627Crev, T5628Crev, G5720A (Orf1a:G1819S, XBB.1.9), C9866T (Main branch of BA.2), T11824Crev, C11956T(XBB.1.9.1), A12160Grev, A12310Grev, C15738T (BJ.1), T15939C (BJ.1), T16342C (BJ.1), A16616Crev, T17859C (BJ.1 & XBB*), ins21765TACATGrev(S:ins69HVrev), del21992-21994(S:Y144del), C22000A (BJ.1), C22109G (BJ.1), G22200A (BJ.1), G22317T(XBB.1), G22577C (BJ.1 & BA.2.75), A26529Grev, T27012Crev, G27505C (Orf8:G8*, Main branch of XBB.1), T27513Crev, T27889Crev, T28297C(Orf9b:I5T, XBB.1.9*/16*/22*/25/26), G28330Arev,G28839T(N:R189L)
Alternatively, mutations based on FL.2.3:
G405Arev, C2710T (BA.5.2.48), C4573T (DY.3), A4579Trev, T12789Crev, A15451Grev, C16887T(BA.5.2.48), G17615Arev, G19326Arev, C22599Grev, A22664Crev, C22895Grev, C22896Trev, A22898Grev, T22917G(BA.4/5), G22942Trev, C23019Trev, C23031Trev, T25416Crev, T26858Crev, C27259Arev, C27382Grev, T27383Arev, C27384Trev, G27505C, G28839T(N:R189L), G29868A(BA.5)

Guangdong/GDCDC_SZHG_0193/2023|EPI_ISL_17697616|2023-04-24
BF*+T6979G / FL.2?
Mutation base on BA.5.2.1: C44T, C106T, C1594T, C2110A, T2112C, C3177T, T4579A(FL.2), A4851G, C6224T, T6394C, T6673C, C6968T, T6979G(the mutation of a large branch of BF*), C7329G, C8290T, C8299T, A8992G, C12789T(XBB.1.9*/XBB.1.23), G15451A(BJ.1 & BA.2.75), C18431T, C19854T, C21440T, C22120T, C22295T, G22599C, C22664A (BJ.1), A22881G, G23018Trev, C23802T, G24386A, G26416A, C26625T, G28085A, G28330Arev, T29417C, C29838T
But it has neither F486V nor F486P but 486F. And it is seemed that a saltation was happened.
Probably not recombinant, proposed in cov-lineages/pango-designation#1919

Guangdong/GDCDC_CZ_0114/2023|EPI_ISL_17697708|2023-04-24
BF.7.14 / BA.5.2+C27012T, C27513T (Main branch of BA.5.2)
Mutation base on BF.7.14: T1Arev, C44T, G653A, T1602G, C3646T, C7834T, G18318T, G24998T(DZ.1?), T25290Grev, C27012T, G27038Arev, C27513T, T27532Crev, T28361Grev, G28371Trev

@Walde1nsamkeit Walde1nsamkeit changed the title Potential Recombinants in China Several Potential Recombinants in China May 28, 2023
@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Currently, except GDCDC_GZ_0351 and GDCDC_FS_0044, all sequences with N:R189L in China are XBB.1.9.1*. And except those two and Hubei/HCDC-1181, all these sequences have A17615G. Two of these sequences lost T4579A due to sequencing error or reversion mutation, but they should be FL.2 too.

@FedeGueli
Copy link

Thx great work!

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented May 28, 2023

Hubei/HCDC-1000/2023|EPI_ISL_17625385|2023-04-27
HCDC-0999 FR.1.4 / DY.4+Orf1a:S3949N, T4175I
Mutations based on FR.1: T337Crev (0999), C1627T (BA.5.2/10/11), C2061T (0999), T2372C (FR.1.1/4), C8626T (BA.5.2.48), C11515Trev, G12111A (Orf1a:S3949N, common in DY.4), G12160A(BA.4/5), C12789T(Orf1a:T4175I, common in BA.5.2.48 or DY.4), T14961C (FR.1.1/4), C15960T (FR.1.4), C16887T(BA.5.2.48), del21765-21770(BA.1/4/5), G22121Arev, G22190Arev, A22331Grev, G22942Trev, T25416Crev, G26459Arev, G26529A(BA.5), A28330G(BA.5.2), T29370Crev

Hubei/HCDC-1001/2023|EPI_ISL_17625388|2023-04-27
FL.2 / DY.4+Orf1a:S3949N, T4175I
Mutations based on FL.2: G405Arev, C920T, C8626T (BA.5.2.48), G12111A (Orf1a:S3949N, common in DY.4), T15738Crev, G12160A (BA.4/5), G22109Crev, A22200G (BA.2/4/5), T22317Grev, C23191T, T28245G

Hubei/HCDC-1002/2023|EPI_ISL_17625384|2023-04-27
FL.2+Orf1b:K1383R+C25803T / DY.4+Orf1a:S3949N, T4175I
Mutations based on FL.2: G12111A (Orf1a:S3949N, common in DY.4), G12160A(BA.4/5), A17615G (Orf1b:K1383R), A22200G(BA.2/4/5), T22317Grev, C25803T.

Hubei/HCDC-1003/2023|EPI_ISL_17625389|2023-04-27
FL.2+Orf1b:K1383R+S:H146K / DY.4+Orf1a:S3949N, T4175I
Mutations based on FL.2: G12111A (Orf1a:S3949N, common in DY.4), G12160A(BA.4/5), A17615G (Orf1b:K1383R), C21998A (S:Q146K),G22109Crev, A22200G(BA.2/4/5), T22317Grev.

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

GDCDC_SZHG_0193 is quite similar to several sequences collected in Shenyang, Liaoning since 2023-02-21.

Sequences: EPI_ISL_17493027, EPI_ISL_17495186, EPI_ISL_17495358,
EPI_ISL_17495368-17495369, EPI_ISL_17652380, EPI_ISL_17697616

Mutations based on BA.5.2.1: T6979G> C26625T> T2112C> T6394C> C23802T> C3177T> C1594T> C2110A, A4851G, T6673C, C6968T, C7329G, C8290T, A8992G, C12789T, G15451A, C21440T, C22120T, C22295T, G22599C, C22664A, A22881G, G23018Trev, G24386A, G26416A, G28330Arev, T29417C
> T4579A, C6224T> C106T, C8299T> T22981C or C18431T, C19854T, G28085A

The bolded mutations are included in XBB.1.9*/25.
These sequences seem unrelated to FL.2.

@FedeGueli
Copy link

Yes this cluster already proposed abd discussed in the main pango page (Search: Liaoning)

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented May 29, 2023

Almost all sequences with G12111A and C12789T mutations assigned as "BA.5.2.48" by GISAID actually have also C20762T and A29868Grev mutations, it means all of these sequences are actually DY.4.
More than a half of DY.4 sequences in China and 3/4 in Hubei have both G12111A and C12789T mutations, which is related to the sublineage proposed in cov-lineages/pango-designation#1620.

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented Jun 3, 2023

Sichuan/DZCDC-CX0023/2023|EPI_ISL_17684194|2023-04-30

DZCDC-CX0024 related FL.13.1+A2611G / DZCDC-CX0017 related (BF.7.14 / BA.5.2.48)?

Mutations Base on FL.13.1:
G1Arev, C44T, C1627T(BA.5.2/10/11), C1848T(0024), A2611G(common in FL.13.1, also contained in 0024), C2710T(BA.5.2.48), C4573T(DY.3), A5720Grev, G10658A(0024), G12160A(BA.4/5), G12310A(BA.5.2), C13011T(0024), C13436T, T15738Crev, C15939Trev, C16616A(BA.5.2), C16887T(BA.5.2.48), C17010G, T17208C(BA.5.2.48), C18962T(0017), del21765-21770(BA.1/4/5), A21801G(0017), T22159C(0017), T22304A, T22317Grev, C27889T(BA.4/5), C28297Trev, A28330G(BA.5.2), A28338G(0017), G28361T(BA.5.2.1), G28371T(BA.5.2.1)

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented Jun 3, 2023

A potential recombinant is found while finding the DY.3 donor of DZCDC-CX0023.
Sichuan/DZCDC-CX0017/2023|EPI_ISL_17563623|2023-04-12
BF.7.14 / BA.5.2.48
Mutations based on BF.7.14:
C1077A, A1596C, C2710T(BA.5.2.48), C8626T(BA.5.2.48), C10702T, G12310A(main branch of BA.5.2), C16616A(main branch of BA.5.2), C16887T(BA.5.2.48), T16974C, T17208C(BA.5.2.48), C18962T, T19955Crev, A21801G, T22159C, G25471C, C27513T(main branch of BA.5.2), A28338G

Mutations based on BA.5.2.48:
C1077A, G1085T(BF.7.14), A1596C, C7528T(BF.7), C10702T, G14181C(BF.7.14/27), T16974C, C18962T, A21801G, T22159C, G22599C(BF.7), G25290T(BF.7.14), G25471C, C27532T(BF.7.14/27), A28338G, G28361T(BA.5.2.1), G28371T(BA.5.2.1), C29632T(BF.7.14)

@FedeGueli
Copy link

If a lineage from this list starts growing please propose separately. thx

Walde1nsamkeit referenced this issue in cov-lineages/pango-designation Jun 12, 2023
@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Sichuan/YBCDC-XGCX238/2023|EPI_ISL_17808220|2023-05-24 XBB.1.5.62+A9922C, C11565T / FR.1.3
Yunnan/YNCDC-1164/2023|EPI_ISL_17808317|2023-05-27 EG.5.1 / FR.1.3
Yunnan/YNCDC-1163/2023|EPI_ISL_17808316|2023-05-27 EG.5.1 / FR.1.3

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented Jun 17, 2023

Jiangxi/JXJDZ-018/2023|EPI_ISL_17794481|2023-04-25 FL.4 / FR.1*
Jiangxi/JXNC-195/2023|EPI_ISL_17794681|2023-05-02 FU.1+A460G / FR.1.2
Jiangxi/JXYT-078/2023|EPI_ISL_17795007|2023-05-29 EG.5.1 / GJ.1
Jiangxi/JXYC-161/2023|EPI_ISL_17794942|2023-05-07 XBL.3 / FU.1+A460G

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Inner_Mongolia/NMCDC-HHH-022/2023|EPI_ISL_17785537|2023-03-20 BF.7.14 / DY.2?

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Beijing/BJCDC-0966/2023|EPI_ISL_17784968|2023-04-06 XBB.1.19.1 / BF.7.14
Beijing/BJCDC-0848/2023|EPI_ISL_17784897|2023-03-30 XBB.1.16 / BF.7.14
Beijing/BJCDC-1261/2023|EPI_ISL_17785150|2023-04-25 FL.4 / BA.5.2*?
Beijing/BJCDC-0851/2023|EPI_ISL_17784900|2023-03-27 DZ.1 / BF.7.14?

@FedeGueli
Copy link

FedeGueli commented Jun 17, 2023

Sichuan/YBCDC-XGCX238/2023|EPI_ISL_17808220|2023-05-24 XBB.1.5.62+A9922C, C11565T /

this is in the same tree of one proposed (the one at the top) in this repo:

Schermata 2023-06-17 alle 16 00 07

@FedeGueli
Copy link

Great work @Over-There-Is i m impressed!

@FedeGueli
Copy link

Schermata 2023-06-17 alle 16 21 42
Always hard to tell with recombinant but this has everything to go well https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome-test.gi.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice1_genome_test_461fd_dbced0.json?label=id:node_7109121

@FedeGueli
Copy link

@Over-There-Is i suggest a cutoff after 1st of may to reduce your load of work

@FedeGueli
Copy link

EPI_ISL_17794681
Please keep these three tracked if also one or two more sequences will pop up somewhere propose them as single lineage here in the preproposal for a rapid review. Thank you for your efforts.

Sichuan/YBCDC-XGCX238/2023|EPI_ISL_17808220|2023-05-24 XBB.1.5.62+A9922C, C11565T / FR.1.3
Yunnan/YNCDC-1164/2023|EPI_ISL_17808317|2023-05-27 EG.5.1 / FR.1.3
Yunnan/YNCDC-1163/2023|EPI_ISL_17808316|2023-05-27 EG.5.1 / FR.1.3

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented Jun 17, 2023

Thanks to @NkRMnZr and @Memorablea!
Xinjiang/XJCDC-TC-082/2023|EPI_ISL_17775584|2023-05-16 FR.1 / XBB.1.42
Liaoning/LNCDC-131-8/2023|EPI_ISL_17775080|2023-04-26 BN.1* / BA.5.2.48*
Xinjiang/XJCDC-TC056/2023|EPI_ISL_17775234|2023-04-29 XBB.1.5* / DY.3 ?
Liaoning/LNCDC-131-6/2023|EPI_ISL_17775077|2023-04-26 XBB.1.9.1 / FR.1
Xinjiang/XJCDC-KLMY-102/2023|EPI_ISL_17775383|2023-05-06 XBB.1* / FR.1
Xinjiang/XJCDC-BAZ-090/2023|EPI_ISL_17775563|2023-05-04 XBB.1* / FR.1
Taiwan/CDC-F80278/2023|EPI_ISL_17766861|2023-04-19 XBB.1.9.2 / DV.6.2 ?
Liaoning/LNCDC-131-3/2023|EPI_ISL_17775091|2023-04-26 FD.2 / XBB.1.16* ?
Xinjiang/XJCDC-KS-101/2023|EPI_ISL_17775197|2023-05-20 XBB.1.44.1 / XBB.1.16*

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Jiangxi/JXNC-174/2023|EPI_ISL_17794675|2023-05-02 #187 / FL.2.3?

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented Jun 17, 2023

Fujian/FCDC-LYCX099/2023|EPI_ISL_17703983|2023-05-16
Contains all defining mutations of XBB.1.19.1 and FY.3.1 except T44Crev

Mutations based on XBB.1:
Homoplastic mutation: T23018C
Mutations from XBB.1.19.1: C541T, C6701T, A10042G, G10105T, C15763T, T21363C, G23222A, G26277A, A29712T, G29810T (7 seq)
Mutations from FY.3.1: C245A, G2513A, G4109T, C5544T, A22161G, T22191C, C23191T, G27915T, T28297C (91 seq)
Private mutations: C16989T, G19480T, C26681T
C26681T is also contained in some Israeli XBB.1.19.1 sequences, but not contained in Sichuan sequences which related to this one.

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

EPI_ISL_17794681
Please keep these three tracked if also one or two more sequences will pop up somewhere propose them as single lineage here in the preproposal for a rapid review. Thank you for your efforts.

Sichuan/YBCDC-XGCX238/2023|EPI_ISL_17808220|2023-05-24 XBB.1.5.62+A9922C, C11565T / FR.1.3
Yunnan/YNCDC-1164/2023|EPI_ISL_17808317|2023-05-27 EG.5.1 / FR.1.3
Yunnan/YNCDC-1163/2023|EPI_ISL_17808316|2023-05-27 EG.5.1 / FR.1.3

although EPI_ISL_17808316 and EPI_ISL_17808317 are both EG.5.1 / FR.1.3, they have different breakpoint.

@FedeGueli
Copy link

@Over_there_is where you see there are too breakpoints that points to contamination or coinfection rather true recombination

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

The sequences with artefact ins27791T almost locate in Jingzhou. But for the sequences with other FR.1* significant mutations, it is believable.

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Sichuan/SCDC-0122/2023|EPI_ISL_18049857|2023-06-27
EG.5.1.1 / FY.3.1?

@FedeGueli
Copy link

Sichuan/SCDC-0122/2023|EPI_ISL_18049857|2023-06-27 EG.5.1.1 / FY.3.1?

I think it is the one proposed by Hynn Spylor

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented Jul 30, 2023

Guangdong/GDCDC_GZ_0494/2023|EPI_ISL_18033830|2023-05-31 XBB.1.16 / FL.2.3
Guangdong/GDCDC_SZ_0796/2023|EPI_ISL_18035035|2023-05-14 XBB.1.16 / FL.2.3

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented Aug 1, 2023

Guangdong/GDCDC_SZHG_1719/2023|EPI_ISL_18036297|2023-06-03 FL.2.3 / XBB.2.3.7
Mutations based on FL.2.3:
A4479C, T9076C, C12853T | T22317Grev, A22320G, T22928C, C23123T, C26447T, C27431T, T27915Grev, C28297Trev, C28717A, G29706T
Mutations based on XBB.2.3:
T4234Crev, A4479C, T4579A, G5720A, A6536Grev, T9076C, C11956T, C12789T, C12853T, T16342C, A17615G | T22928C, C26447T, C28717A

Breakpoint: 17615~22317

FL.2.3+T9076C 5 seqs (All in Nanping, Fujian, China)
FL.2.3> G28980T(N:G236V)> T9076C, T28157G(Orf8:I88M)

XBB.2.3+C26447T, C28717A 14seqs (Fujian 12[Nanping 10, Sanming 2], Singapore 1, Victoria, Australia 1)
XBB.2.3.7> G11042A(Orf1a:V3593I)> G1401A(Orf1a:G379E)> A3503G(Orf1a:N1080D), C8950T> C28717A> C26447T(E:S68F)

Private mutations: A4479C(Orf1a:K1405T), C12853T, T22928C(S:F456L)

Probably originates in Nanping, and exported to somewhere out of Chinese Mainland, and detected by Shenzhen Customs when entering.

@FedeGueli @ryhisner @JosetteSchoenma

Stopped growing

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented Aug 16, 2023

SCDC-HG0803-2915-2/2023|EPI_ISL_18105656|2023-08-01
Imported from Indonesia
FR.1.1 / EG.5.1.1
Breakpoint: 22629~22664(S:356~456)
F157L+K356T+F456L+F486P
Extra mutations: C1686T(Orf1a: A474V), C8782T, G8849A(Orf1a:V2862M), G11966A(Orf1a:A3901T), C14790T, C21057T, C21910T / T23332C, C23453T(S:P631S), C27635T(Orf7a:S81L), C28253T(Artefact?), A28254C(Orf8:I121L, Artefact?)

Designated as XCN

Shanghai/SCDC-XG07-11369-2/2023|EPI_ISL_18105865|2023-07-20
EG.5.1.1 / XBB.1.16* / EG.5.1.1
Breakpoint: 5720~6541, 18703~21718
Extra mutations: T2377C(Private), C6336T(Orf1a:S2024L), C10030T, C14184T(Homoplastic), G20326A
EG.5.1.1+C6336T 3seq
XBB.1.16*+C6336T 73seq none have C10030T
EG.5.1.1+G20326A 8seq none have C6336T
XBB.1.16*+G20326A 10seq none in China, 1 FU.1 have C6336T

Hubei/HCDC-SY2459/2023|EPI_ISL_18105530|2023-08-01
EG.5.1.1 / XBB.1.16
Breakpoint: 25572~27507
Similar to Japan/PG-555753/2023|EPI_ISL_18106306|2023-08-03
Extra mutations: A1982G(Orf1a:I573V), C10408T, C22033A(S:F157L), T22480Crev(Artefact) / C28000T(Orf8:P36L), A28182G(Orf8:S97G)
The Japanese sequence does not have T22480Crev.

proposed by @aviczhl2 in #745, Latest sequence collected on 09-24

Hubei/HCDC-XY2528/2023|EPI_ISL_18105561|2023-08-07
EG.5.1.1 / XBB.1.16
Breakpoint: 22995~25572
Extra mutations: C3141T(Orf1a:P959L), T6178C, A17517G / T25825C(Orf3a:Y185H), C29311T(Homoplastic)

Jiangsu/TZCDC089-2024/2023|EPI_ISL_18105925|2023-07-03
FL.13.2 / EG.5.1.1
Breakpoint: 18492~21718
Extra mutations: G192A, G1401A(Orf1a:G379E), T3279G(Orf1a:I1005S), C7843T, T15354A

Shanghai/SCDC-660/2023|EPI_ISL_18105695|2023-07-20
FY.3.1 / XBB.1.16* / FY.3.1
Breakpoint: 5544~11750, 13960~18703
Extra mutations: C1912T, T1937G(Orf1a:S558A), C21998A(S:Q146K), G25166C(S:E1202Q)

2 seq, ~08-22

Shanghai/SCDC-632/2023|EPI_ISL_18105669|2023-07-13
FE.1.1 / EG.5.1 / FE.1.1
Breakpoint: 5720~8001, 28297~29625
Extra mutations: C832T

Shanghai/SCDC-XG07-11386-2/2023|EPI_ISL_18105882|2023-07-26
EG.5.1* / FY.3.1 / EG.5.1*
Breakpoint: 4109~5544, 27507~29625
Extra mutations: G347A(Orf1a:V28I), C18508T(Orf1b:L1681F), T23084C(S:Y508H)

Hubei/HCDC-XY2465/2023|EPI_ISL_18105551|2023-07-25
FR.1+C1142T / EG.5.1.1
Breakpoint: 1513~2344
Extra mutations: C4633T, C10582T, G16710A, T21388C, T22480Crev(Artefact), G25563C(Orf3a:Q57H)

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented Sep 5, 2023

Hubei/HCDC-HG2675/2023|EPI_ISL_18217167|2023-08-16
EG.5.1.1 / FL.2.3.1
Breakpoint: 13627~16878
Mutations based on XBB.1.9+C23018T:
C2334T(Orfa1a:A690V, EG.5), C6541T(EG.5.1.1), C9693T(Orf1a:A3143V, EG.5), G13627A(Orf1b:D54N, EG.5.1.1) / A17615G(Orf1a:K1383R, FL.2.3), A21603G(S:Q14R, Private), A22629C(S:K356T, FL.2.3.1), C27128T(FL.2.3.1)

Query: C2334T, A17615G, A22629C
Stopped growing

@FedeGueli
Copy link

it exchanged 356 for 456 not sure if i was a good deal

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented Sep 20, 2023

Anhui/HFCDC-602/2023|EPI_ISL_18133844|2023-08 FE.1.1.3 / XBB.1.16*
Breakpoint: 28093~28297
Private mutations: T1084C, C12781T
Stopped growing

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented Sep 25, 2023

Henan/JZCDC-139/2023|EPI_ISL_18300568|2023-07-23
Henan/JZCDC-142/2023|EPI_ISL_18300571|2023-07-29
Henan/JZCDC-154/2023|EPI_ISL_18300583|2023-08-04
FL.4 / FL.13.2
Mutations based on XBB.1.9.1:
C5812T(A large branch under FL.4), G16741T(Orf1b:V1092F, FL.4) / C21904T(FL.13.2), C22329T(S:S256L, Private?), A22629C(S:K356T, FL.13.2)
Breakpoint: 16741~21904

Query: G16741T, C21904T, A22629C
Stopped growing

@FedeGueli
Copy link

@Over-There-Is are you still updating this one? i think it is a good thing to let it open .
My question is : did you routinely search if any of these ones had any sort of follow up? I would focus on doublets anyway or singlets with a mutational profile of interest to save your time. In the case you are not doing this anymore please close it!

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Did not found new recombinant recently, so close it.

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented Oct 20, 2023

I didn't use XBB as root sequence to analyse sequences recently. It's quiet efficiently to find recombinants but I forgot to use it.

@FedeGueli
Copy link

I didn't use XBB as root sequence to analyse sequences recently. It's quiet efficiently to find recombinants but I forgot to use it.

is it on Nextclade?

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

I didn't use XBB as root sequence to analyse sequences recently. It's quiet efficiently to find recombinants but I forgot to use it.

is it on Nextclade?

No on Nextclade, but it's modified based on the Nextclade reference sequence and tree.

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented Oct 20, 2023

XBB.1.9+S:S486P+
C21T, G599A, C673T, C1385T, G1820A, A2109G, C3768T, T4579A / C6541T, A7150C, C9693T, C11173T, G13627A, A16878T, A18492G, G21718T, C22480T, G22927T, T22930A, C25572T / C28093T

FL.2.4 / EG.5.1.1+A7150C, C11173T, G22927T, G28212T / FL.2.4?

Sichuan/LZCDC-166/2023|EPI_ISL_18409297|2023-09-28
Australia/NSW-ICPMR-49586/2023|EPI_ISL_18411535|2023-09-23
Australia/NSW-ICPMR-49614/2023|EPI_ISL_18411563|2023-09-29
Australia/NSW-ICPMR-49647/2023|EPI_ISL_18411596|2023-09-30

Breakpoint 1: 4579~6541
Breakpoint 2: 25572~27507

C21T, T4579A, C28093T are from FL.2.4
C9693T, G13627A, A16878T, A18492G, G21718T, C22480T, T22930A, C25572T are from EG.5.1.1
HK.3 has G22927T too, but A7150C, C11173T seems from #537#branch_10

G599A, C673T, C1385T, G1820A, A2109G, C3768T seem private.

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Gansu/GSCDC-0503/2023|EPI_ISL_18464982|2023-10-24
XBB.1.42.2 / HK.1
Breakpoint: 9049~9693
Extra mutations: G3250A, C6114A(Orf1a:P1950H, a large branch with HL.2) / T21144C, A21603G(S:Q14R, maybe from HK.1> Orf1a:V2019I> S:Q14R branch?), G28202T, G28392A(N:R40H, Orf9b:V37I)

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented Nov 9, 2023

Hubei/HCDC-WH3434/2023|EPI_ISL_18485331|2023-10-18
FL.15/HK.3.2
9693~11956

Mutations Based on XBB.1.9+S:S486P: C1174T, G1464T, G2174A, C3646T, C7735T, G11083T, G13627A, A16878T, A18492G, T20349G, C20759T, C21602A, G21718T, C22480T, C22786A, G22927T, T22930A, C25339T, C25572T, A27507C, A27669G, C29625T
Extra Mutations: C1174T, G1464T(Orf1a:G400V), C3646T, C7735T, G11083T(Orf1a:L3606F, potential artefact), T20349G(Orf1b:S2294R), C20759T(Orf1b:A2431V), C22786Arev(S:S408Rrev, potential artefact), C25339T, A27669G

FL.15> G1464T(Orf1a:G400V)> C12890T> C7735T
HK.3.2> A27669G> T8623C, C25339T
C1174T, C3646T, T20349G, C20759T are private

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented Nov 10, 2023

Yunnan/YNCDC-3260/2023|EPI_ISL_18488078|2023-10-30
EG.5.1/BF.7.14/EG.5.1
23031~25290
27915~28297

Mutations Based on BA.2:
A405G, del686-694, C2334T, A2430G, C4012T, G5720A, C9693T, C9866T, A10323G, T12313A, C12789T, G15025A, G15451A, C15738T, T15939C, T16342C, A16878T, T17859C, A18492G, A19326G, G21718T, C21727T, C21767T, T21810C, C22000A, C22109G, G22200A, G22317T, C22480T, G22577C, G22599C, C22664A, G22895C, T22896C, G22898A, T22930A, T22942G, T23018C, T23019C, T23031C, G23040A, T24763C, C24766T, G25290T, C25509T, G26529A, T26858C, A27038G, C27259A, C27382G, T27383A, C27384T, C27889T, T28297C, C29625T

Extra Mutations:
del686-694(Orf1a:del141-143), A2430G(Orf1a:K722R), C4012T, A10323G(Orf1a:K3353R), T12313A, G15025A(Orf1b:A520T), C21727T, C21767T(S:H69Y), T24763C, C24766T, C25509T, C27532Trev(Orf7a:Y47Hrev, potential artefact), del28242-28252(Orf8:del117-120, fs)

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Gansu/GSCDC-0503/2023|EPI_ISL_18464982|2023-10-24 XBB.1.42.2 / HK.1 Breakpoint: 9049~9693 Extra mutations: G3250A, C6114A(Orf1a:P1950H, a large branch with HL.2) / T21144C, A21603G(S:Q14R, maybe from HK.1> Orf1a:V2019I> S:Q14R branch?), G28202T, G28392A(N:R40H, Orf9b:V37I)

Both XBB.1.42.2 and HK.1 are mainly in Xinjiang. but no recombinant in the latest batch. Maybe these 2 lineages also circulate in other Northwestern Chinese Provinces or Central Asia.

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented Nov 12, 2023

Shanxi/TYCDC300/2023|EPI_ISL_18495231|2023-06-23
FR.1.4/EG.5.1
5720~7318
C22413T(S:T284I), C29762T

Shanxi/TYCDC352/2023|EPI_ISL_18495283|2023-07-07 FY.3.2/EG.5.1.1 potential contamination

Gansu/QYCDC-693/2023|EPI_ISL_18495563|2023-06-23 FY.3.3/EG.5.1.1 too many breakpoint and dropout, potential contamination

Gansu/QYCDC-897/2023|EPI_ISL_18495577|2023-09-01 EG.14/EG.5.1.1/FL.15.2/EG.5.1.1/FL.15.2 potential contamination

Gansu/QYCDC-704/2023|EPI_ISL_18495569|2023-06-28 EG.5.1.1 dropout contaminated by FY.3
Gansu/QYCDC-696/2023|EPI_ISL_18495566|2023-06-27 EG.5.1.1 dropout contaminated by FL.2.3+N:R189L
Shanxi/TYCDC350/2023|EPI_ISL_18495281|2023-07-07 EG.5.1.1 dropout?
Shanxi/TYCDC423/2023|EPI_ISL_18495354|2023-08-04 FU.1 dropout

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Gansu/QYCDC-0522/2023|EPI_ISL_18495868|2023-05-29 BA.5.2.48/BF.7.14.5/BA.5.2.48
14181~16616 22599~25290
BA.5.2.48> C11824T(The branch with DY.2/3)
BF.7.14.5> A25659T> T9229C> C21721T
Private mutations: A929G(Orf1a:I222V), C21721T, G23018Trev(S:V486Frev), G24570T(S:S1003I), C26907T

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Walde1nsamkeit commented Nov 15, 2023

Sichuan/ZGCDC-zgxg492/2023|EPI_ISL_18505570|2023-10-30
Sichuan/ZYCDC-YJ2188/2023|EPI_ISL_18505573|2023-10-19
FL.2.4/HK.13/FL.2.4
4579~6541 27507~28093
C2485T is from FL.2.4>C2485T branch
T11522C(Orf1a:F3753L), G12328A, C25810T(Orf3a:L140F) are private

Query: C2485T, T4579A, G22927C

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

Xinjiang/XJCDCBAZ-313/2023|EPI_ISL_18505718|2023-09-06 EG.5.1.1/FL.4
25572~27507

EG.5.1.1> A4870G, C11455T
FL.4> C5812T> C29272T

C18490T(Orf1b:P1675S), T24934C, G25933C(Orf3a:E181Q), A27107G are private

@Walde1nsamkeit
Copy link
Author

C12513T, A14010G, G18318T Potential EG.5.1/HV.1 recombinant, 3 seq

@Walde1nsamkeit

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants