-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Several Potential Recombinants in China #108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Currently, except GDCDC_GZ_0351 and GDCDC_FS_0044, all sequences with N:R189L in China are XBB.1.9.1*. And except those two and Hubei/HCDC-1181, all these sequences have A17615G. Two of these sequences lost T4579A due to sequencing error or reversion mutation, but they should be FL.2 too. |
Thx great work! |
Hubei/HCDC-1000/2023|EPI_ISL_17625385|2023-04-27 Hubei/HCDC-1001/2023|EPI_ISL_17625388|2023-04-27 Hubei/HCDC-1002/2023|EPI_ISL_17625384|2023-04-27 Hubei/HCDC-1003/2023|EPI_ISL_17625389|2023-04-27 |
GDCDC_SZHG_0193 is quite similar to several sequences collected in Shenyang, Liaoning since 2023-02-21. Sequences: EPI_ISL_17493027, EPI_ISL_17495186, EPI_ISL_17495358, Mutations based on BA.5.2.1: T6979G> C26625T> T2112C> T6394C> C23802T> C3177T> C1594T> C2110A, A4851G, T6673C, C6968T, C7329G, C8290T, A8992G, C12789T, G15451A, C21440T, C22120T, C22295T, G22599C, C22664A, A22881G, G23018Trev, G24386A, G26416A, G28330Arev, T29417C The bolded mutations are included in XBB.1.9*/25. |
Yes this cluster already proposed abd discussed in the main pango page (Search: Liaoning) |
Almost all sequences with G12111A and C12789T mutations assigned as "BA.5.2.48" by GISAID actually have also C20762T and A29868Grev mutations, it means all of these sequences are actually DY.4. |
Sichuan/DZCDC-CX0023/2023|EPI_ISL_17684194|2023-04-30 DZCDC-CX0024 related FL.13.1+A2611G / DZCDC-CX0017 related (BF.7.14 / BA.5.2.48)? Mutations Base on FL.13.1: |
A potential recombinant is found while finding the DY.3 donor of DZCDC-CX0023. Mutations based on BA.5.2.48: |
If a lineage from this list starts growing please propose separately. thx |
Sichuan/YBCDC-XGCX238/2023|EPI_ISL_17808220|2023-05-24 XBB.1.5.62+A9922C, C11565T / FR.1.3 |
Jiangxi/JXJDZ-018/2023|EPI_ISL_17794481|2023-04-25 FL.4 / FR.1* |
Inner_Mongolia/NMCDC-HHH-022/2023|EPI_ISL_17785537|2023-03-20 BF.7.14 / DY.2? |
Beijing/BJCDC-0966/2023|EPI_ISL_17784968|2023-04-06 XBB.1.19.1 / BF.7.14 |
Great work @Over-There-Is i m impressed! |
|
@Over-There-Is i suggest a cutoff after 1st of may to reduce your load of work |
|
Thanks to @NkRMnZr and @Memorablea! |
Jiangxi/JXNC-174/2023|EPI_ISL_17794675|2023-05-02 #187 / FL.2.3? |
Fujian/FCDC-LYCX099/2023|EPI_ISL_17703983|2023-05-16 Mutations based on XBB.1: |
although EPI_ISL_17808316 and EPI_ISL_17808317 are both EG.5.1 / FR.1.3, they have different breakpoint. |
@Over_there_is where you see there are too breakpoints that points to contamination or coinfection rather true recombination |
The sequences with artefact ins27791T almost locate in Jingzhou. But for the sequences with other FR.1* significant mutations, it is believable. |
Sichuan/SCDC-0122/2023|EPI_ISL_18049857|2023-06-27 |
I think it is the one proposed by Hynn Spylor |
Guangdong/GDCDC_GZ_0494/2023|EPI_ISL_18033830|2023-05-31 XBB.1.16 / FL.2.3 |
Guangdong/GDCDC_SZHG_1719/2023|EPI_ISL_18036297|2023-06-03 FL.2.3 / XBB.2.3.7 Breakpoint: 17615~22317 FL.2.3+T9076C 5 seqs (All in Nanping, Fujian, China) XBB.2.3+C26447T, C28717A 14seqs (Fujian 12[Nanping 10, Sanming 2], Singapore 1, Victoria, Australia 1) Private mutations: A4479C(Orf1a:K1405T), C12853T, T22928C(S:F456L) Probably originates in Nanping, and exported to somewhere out of Chinese Mainland, and detected by Shenzhen Customs when entering. @FedeGueli @ryhisner @JosetteSchoenma Stopped growing |
SCDC-HG0803-2915-2/2023|EPI_ISL_18105656|2023-08-01 Designated as XCN Shanghai/SCDC-XG07-11369-2/2023|EPI_ISL_18105865|2023-07-20 Hubei/HCDC-SY2459/2023|EPI_ISL_18105530|2023-08-01 proposed by @aviczhl2 in #745, Latest sequence collected on 09-24 Hubei/HCDC-XY2528/2023|EPI_ISL_18105561|2023-08-07 Jiangsu/TZCDC089-2024/2023|EPI_ISL_18105925|2023-07-03 Shanghai/SCDC-660/2023|EPI_ISL_18105695|2023-07-20 2 seq, ~08-22 Shanghai/SCDC-632/2023|EPI_ISL_18105669|2023-07-13 Shanghai/SCDC-XG07-11386-2/2023|EPI_ISL_18105882|2023-07-26 Hubei/HCDC-XY2465/2023|EPI_ISL_18105551|2023-07-25 |
Hubei/HCDC-HG2675/2023|EPI_ISL_18217167|2023-08-16 Query: C2334T, A17615G, A22629C |
it exchanged 356 for 456 not sure if i was a good deal |
Anhui/HFCDC-602/2023|EPI_ISL_18133844|2023-08 FE.1.1.3 / XBB.1.16* |
Henan/JZCDC-139/2023|EPI_ISL_18300568|2023-07-23 Query: G16741T, C21904T, A22629C |
@Over-There-Is are you still updating this one? i think it is a good thing to let it open . |
Did not found new recombinant recently, so close it. |
I didn't use XBB as root sequence to analyse sequences recently. It's quiet efficiently to find recombinants but I forgot to use it. |
is it on Nextclade? |
No on Nextclade, but it's modified based on the Nextclade reference sequence and tree. |
XBB.1.9+S:S486P+ FL.2.4 / EG.5.1.1+A7150C, C11173T, G22927T, G28212T / FL.2.4? Sichuan/LZCDC-166/2023|EPI_ISL_18409297|2023-09-28 Breakpoint 1: 4579~6541 C21T, T4579A, C28093T are from FL.2.4 G599A, C673T, C1385T, G1820A, A2109G, C3768T seem private. |
Gansu/GSCDC-0503/2023|EPI_ISL_18464982|2023-10-24 |
Hubei/HCDC-WH3434/2023|EPI_ISL_18485331|2023-10-18 Mutations Based on XBB.1.9+S:S486P: C1174T, G1464T, G2174A, C3646T, C7735T, G11083T, G13627A, A16878T, A18492G, T20349G, C20759T, C21602A, G21718T, C22480T, C22786A, G22927T, T22930A, C25339T, C25572T, A27507C, A27669G, C29625T FL.15> G1464T(Orf1a:G400V)> C12890T> C7735T |
Yunnan/YNCDC-3260/2023|EPI_ISL_18488078|2023-10-30 Mutations Based on BA.2: Extra Mutations: |
Both XBB.1.42.2 and HK.1 are mainly in Xinjiang. but no recombinant in the latest batch. Maybe these 2 lineages also circulate in other Northwestern Chinese Provinces or Central Asia. |
Shanxi/TYCDC300/2023|EPI_ISL_18495231|2023-06-23 Shanxi/TYCDC352/2023|EPI_ISL_18495283|2023-07-07 FY.3.2/EG.5.1.1 potential contamination Gansu/QYCDC-693/2023|EPI_ISL_18495563|2023-06-23 FY.3.3/EG.5.1.1 too many breakpoint and dropout, potential contamination Gansu/QYCDC-897/2023|EPI_ISL_18495577|2023-09-01 EG.14/EG.5.1.1/FL.15.2/EG.5.1.1/FL.15.2 potential contamination Gansu/QYCDC-704/2023|EPI_ISL_18495569|2023-06-28 EG.5.1.1 dropout contaminated by FY.3 |
Gansu/QYCDC-0522/2023|EPI_ISL_18495868|2023-05-29 BA.5.2.48/BF.7.14.5/BA.5.2.48 |
Sichuan/ZGCDC-zgxg492/2023|EPI_ISL_18505570|2023-10-30 Query: C2485T, T4579A, G22927C |
Xinjiang/XJCDCBAZ-313/2023|EPI_ISL_18505718|2023-09-06 EG.5.1.1/FL.4 EG.5.1.1> A4870G, C11455T C18490T(Orf1b:P1675S), T24934C, G25933C(Orf3a:E181Q), A27107G are private |
C12513T, A14010G, G18318T Potential EG.5.1/HV.1 recombinant, 3 seq |
Guangdong/GDCDC_GZ_0351/2023|EPI_ISL_17698183|2023-05-05
XBB.1.16.1 / FL.2.3+N:R189L
Mutations based on XBB.1.16.1: G5720A (Orf1a:G1819S, XBB.1.9), T7194T, T11750Crev, A17615G(Orf1b:K1383R, FL.2.3), T18703Grev, C22050T, G28447Arev, G28839T(N:R189L), T29386Crev
Guangdong/GDCDC_GZ_0352/2023|EPI_ISL_17698156|2023-05-05
XBB.1.16 / FL.2.3
Mutations based on XBB.1.16: T326C, G5720A (Orf1a:G1819S, XBB.1.9), T8835C (a common sequencing error in sequences uploaded by Guangzhou), T11750Crev, A17615G(Orf1b:K1383R, FL.2.3), G28447Arev
Guangdong/GDCDC_JM_0092/2023|EPI_ISL_17698225|2023-05-10
Reported by @NkRMnZr firstly.
XBB.1.9(.2?)* / FU.1+A460G(#50)
Mutations based on XBB.1.9+F486P:
A460G, T12730A (XBB.1.16), T12789Crev, G18703T (XBB.1.16), C29386T (XBB.1.16)
Since it does not contain C11956T (both contained in XBB.1.9.1 and XBB.1.16), the XBB.1.9* donor would not be XBB.1.9.1*.
Guangdong/GDCDC_FS_0044/2023|EPI_ISL_17698261|2023-05-10
Reported by @NkRMnZr firstly.
DY.3 / FL.2.3+N:R189L
Mutations based on DY.3:
T1627Crev, T5628Crev, G5720A (Orf1a:G1819S, XBB.1.9), C9866T (Main branch of BA.2), T11824Crev, C11956T(XBB.1.9.1), A12160Grev, A12310Grev, C15738T (BJ.1), T15939C (BJ.1), T16342C (BJ.1), A16616Crev, T17859C (BJ.1 & XBB*), ins21765TACATGrev(S:ins69HVrev), del21992-21994(S:Y144del), C22000A (BJ.1), C22109G (BJ.1), G22200A (BJ.1), G22317T(XBB.1), G22577C (BJ.1 & BA.2.75), A26529Grev, T27012Crev, G27505C (Orf8:G8*, Main branch of XBB.1), T27513Crev, T27889Crev, T28297C(Orf9b:I5T, XBB.1.9*/16*/22*/25/26), G28330Arev,G28839T(N:R189L)
Alternatively, mutations based on FL.2.3:
G405Arev, C2710T (BA.5.2.48), C4573T (DY.3), A4579Trev, T12789Crev, A15451Grev, C16887T(BA.5.2.48), G17615Arev, G19326Arev, C22599Grev, A22664Crev, C22895Grev, C22896Trev, A22898Grev, T22917G(BA.4/5), G22942Trev, C23019Trev, C23031Trev, T25416Crev, T26858Crev, C27259Arev, C27382Grev, T27383Arev, C27384Trev, G27505C, G28839T(N:R189L), G29868A(BA.5)
Guangdong/GDCDC_SZHG_0193/2023|EPI_ISL_17697616|2023-04-24
BF*+T6979G / FL.2?
Mutation base on BA.5.2.1: C44T, C106T, C1594T, C2110A, T2112C, C3177T, T4579A(FL.2), A4851G, C6224T, T6394C, T6673C, C6968T, T6979G(the mutation of a large branch of BF*), C7329G, C8290T, C8299T, A8992G, C12789T(XBB.1.9*/XBB.1.23), G15451A(BJ.1 & BA.2.75), C18431T, C19854T, C21440T, C22120T, C22295T, G22599C, C22664A (BJ.1), A22881G, G23018Trev, C23802T, G24386A, G26416A, C26625T, G28085A, G28330Arev, T29417C, C29838T
But it has neither F486V nor F486P but 486F. And it is seemed that a saltation was happened.
Probably not recombinant, proposed in cov-lineages/pango-designation#1919
Guangdong/GDCDC_CZ_0114/2023|EPI_ISL_17697708|2023-04-24
BF.7.14 / BA.5.2+C27012T, C27513T (Main branch of BA.5.2)
Mutation base on BF.7.14: T1Arev, C44T, G653A, T1602G, C3646T, C7834T, G18318T, G24998T(DZ.1?), T25290Grev, C27012T, G27038Arev, C27513T, T27532Crev, T28361Grev, G28371Trev
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: