Skip to content

Commit b92ffd5

Browse files
authored
cargo: use SPDX license format
We were previously using '/' to indicate the dual licensing scheme, but I guess we're now supposed to use 'OR'. PR #843
1 parent f6e52da commit b92ffd5

File tree

4 files changed

+4
-4
lines changed

4 files changed

+4
-4
lines changed

bench/Cargo.toml

+1-1
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ publish = false
33
name = "regex-benchmark"
44
version = "0.1.0"
55
authors = ["The Rust Project Developers"]
6-
license = "MIT/Apache-2.0"
6+
license = "MIT OR Apache-2.0"
77
repository = "https://github.com/rust-lang/regex"
88
documentation = "https://docs.rs/regex"
99
homepage = "https://github.com/rust-lang/regex"

regex-capi/Cargo.toml

+1-1
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
22
name = "rure"
33
version = "0.2.1" #:version
44
authors = ["The Rust Project Developers"]
5-
license = "MIT/Apache-2.0"
5+
license = "MIT OR Apache-2.0"
66
readme = "README.md"
77
repository = "https://github.com/rust-lang/regex"
88
documentation = "https://github.com/rust-lang/regex/tree/master/regex-capi"

regex-debug/Cargo.toml

+1-1
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ publish = false
33
name = "regex-debug"
44
version = "0.1.0"
55
authors = ["The Rust Project Developers"]
6-
license = "MIT/Apache-2.0"
6+
license = "MIT OR Apache-2.0"
77
repository = "https://github.com/rust-lang/regex"
88
documentation = "https://docs.rs/regex"
99
homepage = "https://github.com/rust-lang/regex"

regex-syntax/Cargo.toml

+1-1
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
22
name = "regex-syntax"
33
version = "0.6.25" #:version
44
authors = ["The Rust Project Developers"]
5-
license = "MIT/Apache-2.0"
5+
license = "MIT OR Apache-2.0"
66
repository = "https://github.com/rust-lang/regex"
77
documentation = "https://docs.rs/regex-syntax"
88
homepage = "https://github.com/rust-lang/regex"

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)