Skip to content

Commit 4baab92

Browse files
committed
📝 118 lines of code
1 parent 3c3ef85 commit 4baab92

File tree

2 files changed

+4
-4
lines changed

2 files changed

+4
-4
lines changed

CHANGELOG.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ Please file a bug if you notice a violation of semantic versioning.
2323
### Removed
2424

2525
## [1.1.8] 2025-05-06 ([tag][1.1.8t])
26-
- Line Coverage: 100.0% (117 / 117)
27-
- Branch Coverage: 100.0% (4 / 4)
26+
- COVERAGE: 100.00% -- 118/118 lines in 8 files
27+
- BRANCH COVERAGE: 100.00% -- 4/4 branches in 8 files
2828
- 84.62% documented
2929
### Added
3030
- CITATION.cff (@pboling)

README.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ This gem has a very niche purpose, which is:
3838
3. allowing 100% test coverage of Ruby code, including the `Version` module.
3939

4040
As proof in the pudding, this gem achieves 100% test coverage for lines and branches,
41-
all 117 and 4 of them, respectively; coverage enabled in part by patterns from this library.
41+
all 118 and 4 of them, respectively; coverage enabled in part by patterns from this library.
4242
You can make it happen for your library too!
4343

4444
If this isn't **precisely** your use case you may be better off looking at
@@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ or one of the others at the head of this README.
640640
[📌gitmoji]:https://gitmoji.dev
641641
[📌gitmoji-img]:https://img.shields.io/badge/gitmoji-%20😜%20😍-FFDD67.svg?style=flat-square
642642
[🧮kloc]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
643-
[🧮kloc-img]: https://img.shields.io/badge/KLOC-0.117-FFDD67.svg?style=for-the-badge&logo=YouTube&logoColor=blue
643+
[🧮kloc-img]: https://img.shields.io/badge/KLOC-0.118-FFDD67.svg?style=for-the-badge&logo=YouTube&logoColor=blue
644644
[🔐security]: SECURITY.md
645645
[🔐security-img]: https://img.shields.io/badge/security-policy-brightgreen.svg?style=flat
646646
[📄copyright-notice-explainer]: https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/5778/why-do-licenses-such-as-the-mit-license-specify-a-single-year

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)