Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Actually a note about 'complicated' syntax is understandable. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Why not rely on the external OS pipe? Like powershell or bash? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Opening a discussion for #14004 and closing the ticket.
The idea is to be able to write something like this:
the idea is that we want to be able to use pipes ini r2 commands, but r2 commands dont get anything from stdin, so instead of using babckticks and @@ iterators we need a way to express it in a pipe-form, similiar to how
xargs
work in unixIn that case that would work the same way as this:
But as long as || acts as
stdin
we may probably want to handle stdin pipes in more commands likew
for writing strings passed as stdin, those expressions could be groupped inside iterators @@.Maybe this ticket should be moved into the discussions tab
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions