We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Describe the bug Logback TLS doesn't seem to support mutual-TLS when talking to a GELF server that requires a client certificate to be presented.
No test cases. But log4j in the same Tomcat server (different app, same keystore file) connects properly using mutual TLS and logback does not.
logback:
*** ServerHelloDone Warning: no suitable certificate found - continuing without client authentication *** Certificate chain <Empty> ***
log4j:
*** ServerHelloDone matching alias: development_dev-test_a8devintweb-dev *** Certificate chain chain [0] = <redacted contents of my certificate>
Additional context openjdk version "1.8.0_312" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_312-b07) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.312-b07, mixed mode)
SLF4J and Logback version in use. logback-core-1.2.3.jar logback-classic-1.2.3.jar logback-gelf-4.0.0.jar slf4j-api-1.7.25.jar
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Duplicates #27
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Describe the bug
Logback TLS doesn't seem to support mutual-TLS when talking to a GELF server that requires a client certificate to be presented.
No test cases. But log4j in the same Tomcat server (different app, same keystore file) connects properly using mutual TLS and logback does not.
logback:
log4j:
Additional context
openjdk version "1.8.0_312"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_312-b07)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.312-b07, mixed mode)
SLF4J and Logback version in use.
logback-core-1.2.3.jar
logback-classic-1.2.3.jar
logback-gelf-4.0.0.jar
slf4j-api-1.7.25.jar
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: