We have a Dockerfile for the apps/server but not for the actual apps/web yet.

We have a Dockerfile for the apps/server but not for the actual apps/web yet.

anything I can help with? I have experience with Docker. Not sure what you are looking for specific.
One problem is, I see you are using Bun in the apps/server part, but I don't have experience with Bun yet.
I don't know how stable it is yet.

@mxkaske I've fair amount of Docker experience making Dockerfile
I can help with it if needed

Any news about this? A docker-compose file for deploy openstatus could be amazing

@alekitopi if you don't mind using external service within the docker service I can do it ?

Sure? Which is external service?

Clerk? No problem, just that it requires the token.

Having the images built and published on ghcr/docker-hub and an example docker-compose yaml stack for the server and webapp would be great for self-hosters to host openstatus!

Anyone actively working on this? I can take a swing at it.

Any progress?

I already proposed also to help with this issue, but seems there is no real clear communication about what, who, details exactly.

What is the expectation to start with? Is openstatus team expecting to work on this and we fund the issue? I see a message/widget from polar about funding 500$ to have this feature.

Or is openstatus expecting contribution from external to get it done?

If someone can give some clear directive please, because multiple people already offered to help.

@codeagencybe

Sorry for the late reply.
We haven't made any progress on this.
We would love to have a Docker Compose that spins up all the required services to run it in your infrastructure.
We would still rely on an external service to ingest data, Tinybird.
The checker should be improved to handle custom regions other than the Fly one.
We need a docker image to webapp too

I will create some smaller task to make it clearer

Thanks for that comment, really looking forward to that docker-compose setup for the server and webapp relying on the minimal required set of external providers!

Any progress on this yet? Would love to se a Docker Compose

Any updates?

Also interested 👀

We are working on community edition which should be easier to self host

We are working on community edition which should be easier to self host

Normally, when I hear Community Edition, I'm a bit reticent, because lately some of the open-source solutions block some features for paid self-hosted. In this case, is there any information on whether there will be this kind of paywall or what kind of features will be available in Community?

@Rodaviva29
This is how I'm understanding the need for a Docker:

Our community wants a Docker version to easily self-host OpenStatus. Our current version is too tightly integrated with external providers; we want the community edition to be simpler/easier to host.
We will have to trim some parts that are not useful for community use, e.g., (multi-domain status page, Stripe, all the SaaS part of our app, marketing website).

But our main app will still remain fully open-source ,we have a couple of repos that are closed source, mainly marketing functions (e.g. an endpoint that sends some notifications on Stripe events). that are irrelevant for the app itself, but we could/should open-source them too. (You can screenshot this and sent it to me If i change my mind 😂)

If you want to deploy the full version of it you can and you will always be but for the community edition I really think simpler easier to deploy app is the way to go.

We are pushing in this direction with initiatives like this:
https://github.com/openstatusHQ/vercel-edge-ping

what kind of features will be available in Community?

What would you love in the community edition ?

Thanks for responding so fast, and I'm so thankful to hear this.

My biggest fear was being locked with some essential features, and seems it won't follow that approach 🙌🏼.

Some projects have decided to split Community and Commercial self-hosted versions that for example, Community limits essencial integrations (for parity purposes, Discord, Email alerts). And in the other hand Commercial adds those features but limits seats or in this case for parity would limit the number of monitors, and to scale the Commercial, we would need to pay extra monthly to get those. Personally I don't like this open-source approach.

Truly amazed that OpenStatus will follow a real open-source way, and obviously cutting that parts you talked, makes total sense! The core functionality and the use of the Community and I will be in the main features that make OpenStatus amazing! ❤️

Some projects have decided to split Community and Commercial self-hosted versions that for example, Community limits essencial integrations (for parity purposes, Discord, Email alerts). And in the other hand Commercial adds those features but limits seats or in this case for parity would limit the number of monitors, and to scale the Commercial, we would need to pay extra monthly to get those. Personally I don't like this open-source approach.

Me neither, but on our SaaS version, we have to limit some features because it costs us money, and also it's a way to fund the development of OpenStatus.

I have created a new issue #1209 to discuss about what we should include in it :)

Me neither, but on our SaaS version, we have to limit some features because it costs us money, and also it's a way to fund the development of OpenStatus.

I couldn't agree more, in the other side in self-hosted version if there is an approach of being proudly open-source and limiting functionalities that are “essential” (this could be debatable) 😆, it is not my vision for open-source.

Plane.so it's an example I don't like the approach, in the other side Huly.io broke this with truly open-source project management solution including all the features to self-host.

I have created a new issue #1209 to discuss about what we should include in it :)

Awesome, I'll check it out!