-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
[Enhancement] Bump Ansible Playbook to run OpenSearch/Dashboards 1.1.0. #11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@saravanan30erd please take a look on this and let me know your thoughts. |
@peterzhuamazon sure, I can update version 1.1.0 and will raise PR. But I think creating long live branches such as 1.x, 2.x for managing the versions is a bit complex solution because it will become very difficult to manage many branches in future. I think we should use github We can use the same release version of the product, and use main branch as unstable branch with all new changes. Let me know your feedback. |
Is there a playbook version vs app(opensearch) version in Ansible Playbook? Also, we just release documentations for Ansible: https://opensearch.org/docs/latest/opensearch/install/ansible/ Thanks. |
@peterzhuamazon |
I can release 1.0.1 before merging this PR tho, do you find the current state stable for cutting a tag? Thanks. |
@peterzhuamazon Yes, current main branch is working fine for version 1.0.1. |
Thanks. Release 1.0.1 now and will ask others to approve 1.1.0 as well. |
Sure |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
[Enhancement] Bump Ansible Playbook to run OpenSearch/Dashboards 1.1.0.
1.2.0 is coming and 1.1.0 already released.
We should start setting the default version to 1.1.0 for playbooks.
Also suggest having long live branches such as 1.x, 2.x so main will be the unstable branch.
Describe the solution you'd like
See above.
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: