[PRE REVIEW]: xTorch: A High-Level C++ Extension Library for PyTorch (LibTorch)

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @kamisaberi (kamran saberifard)
Repository: https://github.com/kamisaberi/xtorch
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main
Version: v0.2.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/be87b610b51b485d968e0dc39c6b8c40"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/be87b610b51b485d968e0dc39c6b8c40/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/be87b610b51b485d968e0dc39c6b8c40/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/be87b610b51b485d968e0dc39c6b8c40)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @kamisaberi. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@kamisaberi if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.11 s (2750.6 files/s, 297606.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C++                            176           2410           2045           8142
C                                1           1422            142           5303
C/C++ Header                   108           1710           3705           5045
CMake                            5            324            568           1000
Text                             2             36              0             89
Bourne Shell                     2              9             14             53
Markdown                         1             16              0             50
TeX                              1              3              0             20
Dockerfile                       1              6              5             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           297           5936           6479          19720
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

  1212	kamran saberifard
    32	saeed

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 423

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🔴 Failed to discover a valid open source license

[crvernon]

@editorialbot withdraw

@kamisaberi it looks like you submitted this twice. I'll withdraw this one and handle the one originally submitted.

[editorialbot]

Paper withdrawn.

[kamisaberi]

valid open source license added

[kamisaberi]

@editorialbot pdf created

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[kamisaberi]

@editorialbot license file created

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[kamisaberi]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @kamisaberi, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[kamisaberi]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[kamisaberi]

@crvernon i fixed problems . should i submit it again or you can reopen this issue ?

[kamisaberi]

@editorialbot generate my checklist

[editorialbot]

Checklists can only be created once the review has started in the review issue

[kamisaberi]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[kamisaberi]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

TX$^2$: Transformer eXplainability and eXploration
Submitting author: @WarmCyan
Handling editor: @fabian-s (Active)
Reviewers: @assenmacher-mat, @deniederhut
Similarity score: 0.6449

tfaip - a Generic and Powerful Research Framework for Deep Learning based on Tensorflow
Submitting author: @chwick
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @levimcclenny, @Het-Shah
Similarity score: 0.6315

PyDGN: a Python Library for Flexible and Reproducible Research on Deep Learning for Graphs
Submitting author: @diningphil
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @idoby, @sepandhaghighi
Similarity score: 0.6287

GraphNeT: Graph neural networks for neutrino telescope event reconstruction
Submitting author: @asogaard
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @JostMigenda, @GageDeZoort
Similarity score: 0.6284

The nnlib2 library and nnlib2Rcpp R package for implementing neural networks
Submitting author: @VNNikolaidis
Handling editor: @kakiac (Retired)
Reviewers: @schnorr, @MohmedSoudy
Similarity score: 0.6277

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[kamisaberi]

@editorialbot generate my checklist

[editorialbot]

Checklists can only be created once the review has started in the review issue

[kamisaberi]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[kamisaberi]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[kamisaberi]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

flowTorch - a Python library for analysis and reduced-order modeling of fluid flows
Submitting author: @AndreWeiner
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @akaptano, @JaroslavHron, @salrm8, @hkjeldsberg
Similarity score: 0.6773

DeBEIR: A Python Package for Dense Bi-Encoder Information Retrieval
Submitting author: @ayuei
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @KonradHoeffner, @amitkumarj441
Similarity score: 0.6734

tfaip - a Generic and Powerful Research Framework for Deep Learning based on Tensorflow
Submitting author: @chwick
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @levimcclenny, @Het-Shah
Similarity score: 0.6718

TorchMetrics - Measuring Reproducibility in PyTorch
Submitting author: @justusschock
Handling editor: @taless474 (Retired)
Reviewers: @inpefess, @richrobe, @reneraab
Similarity score: 0.6707

PhysioLabXR: A Python Platform for Real-Time, Multi-modal, Brain–Computer Interfaces and Extended Reality Experiments
Submitting author: @ApocalyVec
Handling editor: @mstimberg (Active)
Reviewers: @lucask07, @nastaran62
Similarity score: 0.6685

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[kamisaberi]

@editorialbot generate my checklist

[editorialbot]

Checklists can only be created once the review has started in the review issue

[kamisaberi]

@editorialbot list reviewers

[editorialbot]

Please log in the JOSS Reviewers site to search through the list of current reviewers.

[kamisaberi]

@crvernon what should i do right now

[crvernon]

@kamisaberi - I am working on finding you a topic editor to take this one on. We have a backlog of papers right now but I'll get someone assigned as soon as they become available. Thanks!