[PRE REVIEW]: mlgidGUI - an annotation program for 2D scattering data with powder geometry

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @cvoelt (Constantin Völter)
Repository: https://github.com/mlgid-project/mlgidGUI
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 0.3.8.6
Editor: @lucydot
Reviewers: @stuartcampbell
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/134caa7c385c54236fd67de1c23de2e0"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/134caa7c385c54236fd67de1c23de2e0/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/134caa7c385c54236fd67de1c23de2e0/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/134caa7c385c54236fd67de1c23de2e0)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @cvoelt. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@cvoelt if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1107/S1600576725000974 is OK
- 10.1038/s41524-022-00778-8 is OK
- 10.1080/08940886.2022.2112499 is OK
- 10.1145/3343031.3350535 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.5711226 is OK
- 10.1107/S1600576715004434 is OK
- 10.1107/S1600576717004708 is OK
- 10.1107/S1600576716000455 is OK
- 10.1016/0167-5729(89)90002-2 is OK
- 10.1142/9789811231513_0002 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Computer Vision Annotation Tool (CVAT)
- No DOI given, and none found for title: LabelImg

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.13 s (1234.4 files/s, 136294.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                         151           3336            813          12695
Markdown                         6            205              0            495
YAML                             3             36             13            220
TeX                              1             15              0            165
INI                              1              0              0              3
JSON                             1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           163           3592            826          13579
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

     4	cvoelt
     2	Vladimir Starostin
     2	virtual

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 790

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Reel1.0 - A visualization tool for evaluating powder diffraction refinements
Submitting author: @fgjorup
Handling editor: @rkurchin (Active)
Reviewers: @cmbiwer, @mikapfl
Similarity score: 0.7252

spectrapepper: A Python toolbox for advanced analysis of spectroscopic data for materials and devices.
Submitting author: @enricgrau
Handling editor: @rkurchin (Active)
Reviewers: @stuartcampbell, @ksunden
Similarity score: 0.7094

open_iA: A tool for processing and visual analysis of industrial computed tomography datasets
Submitting author: @codeling
Handling editor: @katyhuff (Retired)
Reviewers: @trallard, @behollister
Similarity score: 0.7037

xtal2png: A Python package for representing crystal structure as PNG files
Submitting author: @sgbaird
Handling editor: @rkurchin (Active)
Reviewers: @dandavies99, @PeterKraus
Similarity score: 0.7003

Dark-field X-ray microscopy visualization
Submitting author: @trygvrad
Handling editor: @jgostick (Active)
Reviewers: @taw10, @marcocamma
Similarity score: 0.6963

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot invite @lucydot as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot invite @lucydot as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[lucydot]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @lucydot is now the editor

[lucydot]

Apologies for late pick-up, I have been on leave

[lucydot]

@cvoelt if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

[cvoelt]

Thank you very much @lucydot for accompanying the review process as an editor. Our suggestions for potential reviewers are:

Jiri Novak [[email protected]] Brno, Czech Republic
Stefan Kowarik [[email protected]] Graz, Austria
Nada Mrkyvkova [[email protected]] Bratislava, Slovakia
Rupak Banerjee [[email protected]] Gandhinagar, India

[lucydot]

@novak-jiri @kowarik-lab @stuartcampbell @jwuttke - hello 👋 - are you available to review this submission?

If you have not reviewed for JOSS, welcome! We are a platinum open access (free-to-author, free-to-read) , "developer-friendly" journal for open source research software. Our review process is fully transparent - it is a discussion between authors, reviewers and editors, with the aim of increasing the quality of the submitted software. For more details, please see our docs. You can also ask me questions here.

[lucydot]

@novak-jiri @kowarik-lab @stuartcampbell @jwuttke - hello 👋 - are you available to review this submission?

[lucydot]

Note here also that I sent an email to invite Nada Mrkyvkova and Rupak Banerjee.

[stuartcampbell]

@novak-jiri @kowarik-lab @stuartcampbell @jwuttke - hello 👋 - are you available to review this submission?

Yes I am

[lucydot]

That is great, thank you @stuartcampbell :) I'll add you as a reviewer now.

[lucydot]

@editorialbot add @stuartcampbell as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@stuartcampbell added to the reviewers list!