[PRE REVIEW]: DSWL: a Python implementation of the Debiased Spatial Whittle Likelihood

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @arthurBarthe (Arthur P. Guillaumin)
Repository: https://github.com/arthurBarthe/debiased-spatial-whittle
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.1
Editor: @gkthiruvathukal
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d62c709974c1ae5e9ac1c36f4da7c1bf"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d62c709974c1ae5e9ac1c36f4da7c1bf/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d62c709974c1ae5e9ac1c36f4da7c1bf/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d62c709974c1ae5e9ac1c36f4da7c1bf)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @arthurBarthe. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@arthurBarthe if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf. Problem with ORCID (0000-0000-0000-0000) for Arthur Guillaumin. Invalid ORCID.

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1111/rssb.12539 is OK
- 10.1093/biomet/asy071 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00622 is OK
- 10.1093/biomet/74.4.877 is OK
- 10.1137/S1064827592240555 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1198/016214508000000959 is OK
- 10.1214/19-STS755 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Fidgit: An ungodly union of GitHub and Figshare
- No DOI given, and none found for title: SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific c...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance dee...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: CuPy: A NumPy-like API Accelerated with CUDA
- No DOI given, and none found for title: pyMRA: Multi-Resolution Approximation for Gaussian...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: GPvecchia: Fast Gaussian-Process Inference Using V...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.32614/cran.package.gpgp may be a valid DOI for title: GpGp: Fast Gaussian Process Computation Using Vecc...
- 10.1016/s0016-7061(00)00010-0 may be a valid DOI for title: Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kri...

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.06 s (1094.7 files/s, 149839.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          40           1114           1551           4089
Markdown                         9             96              0            362
YAML                             7             27             47            185
TeX                              1             23              0            168
Jupyter Notebook                 2              0            654             96
TOML                             1              7              0             38
JavaScript                       2              1              0             28
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            62           1268           2252           4966
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   185	arthur
   107	Arthur
    88	tom
    29	Arthur P. Guillaumin
     1	99139836
     1	Arthur Guillaumin
     1	thomas-goodwin

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1095

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[crvernon]

👋 @arthurBarthe - please fix the ORCID error in your paper as suggested in the automated comment above.

[arthurBarthe]

Hi @crvernon, my apologies I only found this page! This is now fixed.

[arthurBarthe]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

GaussianRandomFields.jl: A Julia package to generate and sample from Gaussian random fields
Submitting author: @PieterjanRobbe
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @shahmoradi
Similarity score: 0.7369

parafields: A generator for distributed, stationary Gaussian processes
Submitting author: @dokempf
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @shahmoradi, @gchure
Similarity score: 0.7349

PySPOD: A Python package for Spectral Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (SPOD)
Submitting author: @mengaldo
Handling editor: @eloisabentivegna (Retired)
Reviewers: @albertonogueira, @joao-l-s-almeida, @jdmoorman
Similarity score: 0.7302

BoxKit: A Python library to manage analysis of block-structured simulation datasets
Submitting author: @akashdhruv
Handling editor: @kellyrowland (Active)
Reviewers: @rvg296, @Abinashbunty
Similarity score: 0.7271

swift-emulator: A Python package for emulation of simulated scaling relations
Submitting author: @Moyoxkit
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @JDonaldM, @kstoreyf
Similarity score: 0.7249

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[crvernon]

@editorialbot invite @gkthiruvathukal as editor

👋 @gkthiruvathukal - are you able to take this one on as editor?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[gkthiruvathukal]

@editorialbot assign myself as editor

[gkthiruvathukal]

@arthurBarthe if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

[gkthiruvathukal]

@editorialbot add @gkthiruvathukal as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @gkthiruvathukal is now the editor

[gkthiruvathukal]

@arthurBarthe Please let me know if you saw my message above.

[arthurBarthe]

Hi @gkthiruvathukal, my apologies, I had a long-ish Easter break! I will also set up my notifications so that I see them in my emails, and hopefully I can be a bit more reactive. I will take a look at potential suggestions for reviewers now.

[arthurBarthe]

Here is a list (order is irrelevant):

1. Marine Guyot MarineChap
2. Robbi Bishop-Taylor robbibt
3. Natasha Yamane nmy2103
4. Anne Fouilloux annefou
5. Wei Ji Leong weiji14

[gkthiruvathukal]

@MarineChap and @robbibt, are either or both of you available to help with this JOSS submission? I am in need of two reviewers to proceed.

[MarineChap]

This looks interesting! I'm available, though it would be my first time doing a review.