[PRE REVIEW]: EWDM: A wavelet-based method for estimating directional spectra of ocean waves

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @dspelaez (Daniel Peláez-Zapata)
Repository: https://github.com/dspelaez/extended-wdm/
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0
Editor: @rwegener2
Reviewers: @rcaneill, @miniufo
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3b59fa36efc62a871bfd48acb056670d"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3b59fa36efc62a871bfd48acb056670d/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3b59fa36efc62a871bfd48acb056670d/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3b59fa36efc62a871bfd48acb056670d)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @dspelaez. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@dspelaez if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.12 s (335.7 files/s, 507807.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSV                              1              0              0          54001
Python                          21            541            854           1573
Markdown                         2             46              0            117
reStructuredText                 6            127            109            112
TeX                              1             11              0            103
YAML                             4             18             24             90
TOML                             1              3              0             49
Jupyter Notebook                 1              0           1124             41
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            39            758           2119          56121
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    44	Daniel Pelaez-Zapata
    23	Daniel Santiago
     2	Daniel Peláez Zapata
     1	yangleir

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1175/JTECH-D-23-0058.1 is OK
- 10.1061/9780872629332.005 is OK
- 10.1061/9780784400890.004 is OK
- 10.1175/1520-0485(1996)026<1901:naotdp>2.0.co;2 is OK
- 10.1002/2015JC010808 is OK
- 10.5334/jors.148 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Extensive Comparison of Directional Wave Analysis ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Analyzing Multidirectional Wave Spectra: A Tentati...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Measuring and Analysing the Directional Spectrum o...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Wavelet and Local Directional Analysis of Ocean Wa...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 673

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

RESOURCECODE: A Python package for statistical analysis of sea-state hindcast data
Submitting author: @NRaillard
Handling editor: @marcosvital (Active)
Reviewers: @krober10nd, @platipodium, @malmans2
Similarity score: 0.7216

PyWavelets: A Python package for wavelet analysis
Submitting author: @grlee77
Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active)
Reviewers: @rafat, @souopgui
Similarity score: 0.7164

PySPOD: A Python package for Spectral Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (SPOD)
Submitting author: @mengaldo
Handling editor: @eloisabentivegna (Retired)
Reviewers: @albertonogueira, @joao-l-s-almeida, @jdmoorman
Similarity score: 0.7017

diwanalr: An R data analysis package for diffusing-wave spectroscopy
Submitting author: @peterjwatkins
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @alexpghayes
Similarity score: 0.6923

OceanSpy: A Python package to facilitate ocean model data analysis and visualization
Submitting author: @malmans2
Handling editor: @kthyng (Active)
Reviewers: @tomchor, @platipodium
Similarity score: 0.6822

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[kthyng]

Hi @dspelaez and thanks for your submission! I am looking for some specific items to make sure your submission fits our requirements at a high level (not at the more detailed review level) before moving on to finding an editor or putting this on our waitlist if no relevant editors are available. I'll comment over time as I have a chance to go through them:

• OSI-approved license
• Installation instructions
• Documentation exists at all
• Tests of some sort
• Check paper (make sure compiles, read through, check for length 250-1000 words)
• Substantial scholarly effort
• Clear research application

In the meantime, please take a look at the comments above ⬆️ from the editorialbot to address any DOI, license, or paper issues if you're able (there may not be any), or suggest reviewers. For reviewers, please suggest 5 reviewers from the database listed above or your own (non-conflicted) extended network. Their github handles are most useful to receive but please don't use "@" to reference them since it will prematurely ping them.

[kthyng]

@dspelaez: I noticed that your docs state "This is an experimental version." This seems to imply your software is in too early a state to spend reviewer time on it — is this the case?

[dspelaez]

Hi @kthyng. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. It was an oversight on my part, and I forgot to remove it before releasing the latest stable version. Despite of this, I believe the software is stable and suitable for reviewer evaluation.

[kthyng]

Ok, thanks.

We have a backlog of submissions so I will add this to our waitlist. Thanks for your patience.

[dspelaez]

Hi @kthyng. No problem, I will patiently await further updates on the review process.

[kthyng]

@cheginit Can you edit this submission?

[kthyng]

@editorialbot invite @cheginit as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[cheginit]

@kthyng, unfortunately, I do not have the bandwidth to edit this at the moment.

[kthyng]

@samhforbes Can you edit this submission? I know it's outside your typical field but thought it might fit through the wavelet analysis.

[kthyng]

@editorialbot invite @samhforbes as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[samhforbes]

Sorry @kthyng I don't think I would know where to start with reviewers for this one!

[kthyng]

Ok no problem, thanks!

[kthyng]

@rwegener2 Can you edit this submission?

[kthyng]

@editorialbot invite @rwegener2 as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[rwegener2]

@editorialbot add me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @rwegener2 is now the editor

[rwegener2]

Hi @dspelaez 👋🏻 My name is Rachel and I'll be your editor for this submission. If you have questions at any point in the submission process please don't hesitate to reach out!

[rwegener2]

👋🏻 @yueyanglu and @michaeldenes, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[michaeldenes]

Hi @rwegener2, with a mix of leave and workshops, sadly I won't have much time in the coming months (until June) to do any reviews. Sorry! :(

[rwegener2]

No worries @michaeldenes. Thanks for the reply, and best of luck with the workshops!

[rwegener2]

👋🏻 @rcaneill, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[rcaneill]

👋🏻 @rcaneill, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

Hi @rwegener2 , sure I can do the review!
Could you remind me about the rough schedule / deadlines of the review process?

[rwegener2]

@editorialbot add @rcaneill as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@rcaneill added to the reviewers list!

[rwegener2]

Thanks for being willing to volunteer your time with JOSS, @rcaneill!

We aim for reviews to be completed within about 2-4 weeks from the start of the review process. You are the first of two reviewers at the moment, so I will start the review once a second reviewer is identified.

[rwegener2]

👋🏻 @miniufo or @bastienqueste, would either of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[bastienqueste]

@rwegener2 somewhat booked up until 4/4 with proposal deadlines and then with the resulting backlog. I could commit to a review by mid/late-April if that's acceptable?

[miniufo]

@rwegener2 Yes I am happy to. Glad to be tagged in here.

[rwegener2]

Thanks @bastienqueste and @miniufo for your willingness to support JOSS! @miniufo I will add you as a reviewer, since it sounds like @bastienqueste will be busy for the next couple weeks

[rwegener2]

@editorialbot add @miniufo as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@miniufo added to the reviewers list!

[rwegener2]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #7942.