-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
[PRE REVIEW]: EddyProfSync: A MATLAB tools for collocating coherent eddy and hydrographic datasets #6347
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Wordcount for |
Failed to discover a valid open source license |
Failed to discover a |
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: ecopath_matlab: A Matlab-based implementation of the Ecopath food web algorithm BioSigKit: A Matlab Toolbox and Interface for Analysis of BioSignals eddy: Extracting Protoplanetary Disk Dynamics with Python Hytool: an open source matlab toolbox for the interpretation of hydraulic tests using analytical solutions uDALES: large-eddy-simulation software for urban flow, dispersion, and microclimate modelling |
@rampatels I'm sorry for the confusion. In the previous submission pre-review issue for this package, I was not asking you to justify reviewing this submission despite its very small number of lines of code. I was trying to check to make sure I wasn't missing something because it is unusually small. To estimate the number of lines of code, I am looking in this case at the line
I have now had the chance to look at the details and I see that, yes, it is indeed quite small. I see that you have added a matlab file to the tutorials since your previous submission, but this does not "count" as additional content and I will defer to the previous submission's count in this case, which was:
This is under the number of lines of code for desk reject (<300 LOC). I'm sorry, this is just too small of an effort to be published as a paper through JOSS. Please note that there are other ways to publish your code; check here for more info: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#other-venues-for-reviewing-and-publishing-software-packages |
@editorialbot reject |
Paper rejected. |
Submitting author: @rampatels (Ramkrushnbhai Shaileshbhai Patel)
Repository: https://github.com/rampatels/EddyProfileCollocator
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @rampatels. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@rampatels if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: