-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
[PRE REVIEW]: BERTeley: A python package for topic modeling on scientific articles #6052
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Wordcount for |
|
@ericchagnon15 – thanks for your submission to JOSS. Could you say more about this paper? i.e., what is the title, what is the focus of the paper? Also, could you clarify what license this software is released under? It looks like a BSD 3-clause but appears to have additional language? |
Friendly reminder here @ericchagnon15 |
Sorry for the delayed response. Elsevier NLP recently accepted our paper titled "Benchmarking topic models on scientific articles using BERTeley" and it focuses on carrying out a benchmarking experiment on different language models for the task of topic modeling. The license we have is the standard BSD 3-clause, and the additional language is a requirement from the intellectual property office and Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. |
Is this something you could share with me to review? My concern here is possible duplicate publications for the same work so I'd like to see how much of the other paper is discussing this software. You can email me a draft at [email protected] |
@ericchagnon15 – we'll need you to update this to a truly 'standard' (i.e., no modifications) license before proceeding with the review. This has happened for LBNL submissions before see here for example: #1370 (comment) |
Here is the link to the preprint version. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949719123000419 |
Thanks @ericchagnon15. I'm going to open a scope review here so other editors can weigh in but given phrases such as:
...I'm inclined to say this isn't publishable here as the JOSS paper would count as a duplicate publication for the same work. |
@editorialbot query scope |
Submission flagged for editorial review. |
@ericchagnon15 – apologies it has taken a while for us to get back to you here but after consideration by the JOSS editorial team we've determined that we believe this article would represent a second publication for the work outlined in this other article (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949719123000419), and as such, is not permitted here. |
@editorialbot reject |
Paper rejected. |
@arfon thanks for taking the time to deliberate and for your consideration! |
Submitting author: @ericchagnon15 (Eric Chagnon)
Repository: https://github.com/lbl-camera/berteley
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper
Version: 0.0.15
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ericchagnon15. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@ericchagnon15 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: