Skip to content

[PRE REVIEW]: stemflow: A Python Package for Adaptive Spatio-Temporal Exploratory Model #5921

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
editorialbot opened this issue Oct 2, 2023 · 33 comments
Assignees
Labels
pre-review Python Track: 6 (ESE) Earth Sciences and Ecology

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

editorialbot commented Oct 2, 2023

Submitting author: @chenyangkang (Yangkang Chen)
Repository: https://github.com/chenyangkang/stemflow
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @diazrenata
Reviewers: @jedalong, @earth-chris
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/50a385b3283faf346fc16484f50f6add"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/50a385b3283faf346fc16484f50f6add/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/50a385b3283faf346fc16484f50f6add/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/50a385b3283faf346fc16484f50f6add)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @chenyangkang. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@chenyangkang if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot editorialbot added pre-review Track: 6 (ESE) Earth Sciences and Ecology labels Oct 2, 2023
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.15 s (300.9 files/s, 83776.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          17            664           1185           2077
TeX                              3            194              0           1336
Jupyter Notebook                 8              0           5294            953
Markdown                        12             95              0            248
YAML                             3             15             21            146
CSS                              1              3             14              7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            44            971           6514           4767
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Wordcount for paper.md is 1132

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1609/aaai.v27i1.8484 is OK
- 10.1093/biosci/biy068 is OK
- 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636 is OK
- 10.1093/biosci/biab093 is OK
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.003 is OK
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.037 is OK
- 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x is OK
- 10.1111/ele.12048 is OK
- 10.2307/1941447 is OK
- 10.1145/356924.356930 is OK
- 10.1002/eap.2056 is OK
- 10.1111/2041-210X.14052 is OK
- 10.1002/ecs2.3994 is OK
- 10.2173/ebirdst.2021 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cub.2023.01.066 is OK
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109523 is OK
- 10.1890/14-1826.1 is OK
- 10.1111/2041-210X.13559 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.04930 is OK
- 10.1002/ecm.1370 is OK
- 10.1101/2022.03.24.485545 is OK
- 10.1111/2041-210X.14101 is OK
- 10.1111/ecog.05877 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@kthyng
Copy link

kthyng commented Oct 2, 2023

Hi @chenyangkang and apologies for the delay in getting this going (I've been out of office). We have a waitlist at the moment since our editorial staff is maxxed out so I will add this to our waitlist. Thanks for your patience.

@kthyng kthyng added the waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. label Oct 2, 2023
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

skedm: Empirical Dynamic Modeling
Submitting author: @nickc1
Handling editor: @jakevdp (Retired)
Reviewers: @johnh2o2
Similarity score: 0.8331

Sapsan: Framework for Supernovae Turbulence Modeling with Machine Learning
Submitting author: @pikarpov-lanl
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @kburns, @milescranmer
Similarity score: 0.8247

flowTorch - a Python library for analysis and reduced-order modeling of fluid flows
Submitting author: @AndreWeiner
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @akaptano, @JaroslavHron, @salrm8, @hkjeldsberg
Similarity score: 0.8223

elapid: Species distribution modeling tools for Python
Submitting author: @earth-chris
Handling editor: @graciellehigino (Active)
Reviewers: @chrisborges, @gabrieldansereau
Similarity score: 0.8210

Spleeter: a fast and efficient music source separation tool with pre-trained models
Submitting author: @romi1502
Handling editor: @terrytangyuan (Retired)
Reviewers: @bmcfee, @faroit
Similarity score: 0.8200

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

@chenyangkang
Copy link

@kthyng No problem! Many thanks to the effort of community!

@chenyangkang
Copy link

Hi @kthyng, may I ask what is the status now? Should I search for potential reviewers and list them here? Thanks.

@kthyng
Copy link

kthyng commented Nov 3, 2023

@chenyangkang Yes please list about 5 reviewer possibility by github handle but without using "@" so we don't preemptively ping them.

@diazrenata Would you be interested in editing this submission? Looks like it has an ecology application.

@kthyng
Copy link

kthyng commented Nov 3, 2023

@editorialbot invite @diazrenata as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

@diazrenata
Copy link

@kthyng Sure! @editorialbot assign me as editor

@diazrenata
Copy link

@editorialbot assign me as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Assigned! @diazrenata is now the editor

@chenyangkang
Copy link

Hi @diazrenata! These reviewers seem to be potential fits.

jedalong
tpoisot
mikemahoney218
skiptoniam
molgor
r-barnes

@chenyangkang
Copy link

Hi @diazrenata, just wanna follow up the status. Is it still waitlisted or under reviewed? Will be looking forward to publishing it so that some of other publications could cite it. Thanks for your efforts and work!

Regards,
Yangkang

@diazrenata
Copy link

Hi @chenyangkang! Thanks for checking in. I am in the process of finding reviewers for this project. Thanks!

@diazrenata diazrenata removed the waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. label Nov 29, 2023
@diazrenata
Copy link

Hi @molgor, @klarrieu, would you be available and interested in reviewing this submission to JOSS?

@diazrenata
Copy link

Hi @jedalong, would you be available and interested in reviewing this submission to JOSS?

@diazrenata
Copy link

Hi @earth-chris, would you be available and interested in reviewing this submission to JOSS?

@jedalong
Copy link

@diazrenata yes i should be able to do this after the holiday break.

@diazrenata
Copy link

@jedalong Thank you very much! I'll go ahead and add you as a reviewer now (the review process will start up once we find a second reviewer - probably after the holidays at this point!)

@diazrenata
Copy link

@editorialbot add @jedalong as a reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

@diazrenata
Copy link

@editorialbot add @jedalong as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jedalong added to the reviewers list!

@earth-chris
Copy link

@diazrenata I am available to review this work

@diazrenata
Copy link

@earth-chris Fantastic - thank you very much! I will add you as a reviewer and initiate the review process (which will open a separate issue).

@earth-chris and @jedalong - JOSS's guide for reviewers has a complete explanation of the review process and critera. The editorialbot system will generate checklists for you to help with reviewing, as well.

Thank you both for your time and attention!

@diazrenata
Copy link

@editorialbot add @earth-chris as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@earth-chris added to the reviewers list!

@diazrenata
Copy link

@editorialbot start review

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

OK, I've started the review over in #6158.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pre-review Python Track: 6 (ESE) Earth Sciences and Ecology
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants