[PRE REVIEW]: nctoolkit: A Python package for netCDF analysis and post-processing

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @robertjwilson (Robert Wilson)
Repository: https://github.com/pmlmodelling/nctoolkit
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-paper
Version: v0.9.2
Editor: @martinfleis
Reviewers: @malmans2, @platipodium
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/06bcbb7e9aa80b276004b9445d6d4dbd"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/06bcbb7e9aa80b276004b9445d6d4dbd/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/06bcbb7e9aa80b276004b9445d6d4dbd/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/06bcbb7e9aa80b276004b9445d6d4dbd)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @robertjwilson. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@robertjwilson if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=5.06 s (41.7 files/s, 14013.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                         151           6556           3209          17086
reStructuredText                16            945            478            908
Jupyter Notebook                12              0          39913            350
TeX                              2             12              0            276
Bourne Shell                    15             75              8            222
YAML                             8             47             52            217
Markdown                         5            138              0            198
HTML                             2             70              0            138
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           211           7843          43660          19395
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 948

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1002/joc.1169 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7112925 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-10-4619-2017 is OK
- 10.5334/jors.148 is OK
- 10.25080/majora-7b98e3ed-00a is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-14-629-2021 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016 is OK
- 10.1038/d41586-018-05869-5 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1109/mcse.2007.55 may be a valid DOI for title: Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kthyng]

Hi @martinfleis — do you work with netcdf files and could edit this submission?

[kthyng]

@editorialbot invite @martinfleis as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[martinfleis]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @martinfleis is now the editor

[martinfleis]

Hi @alexamici, @malmans2, would you be willing to help us review this submission? I believe it is very close to your expertise. Thanks!

[malmans2]

Hi there,
Sure, I can review this!

[martinfleis]

@editorialbot add @malmans2 as reviewer

@malmans2 Thanks!

[editorialbot]

@malmans2 added to the reviewers list!

[platipodium]

@martinfleis I work a lot with netcdf files, so if you agree, I'd offer myself as a reviewer for this submission.

[martinfleis]

@editorialbot add @platipodium as reviewer

Thanks a lot @platipodium!

[editorialbot]

@platipodium added to the reviewers list!

[martinfleis]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5494.