-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
[PRE REVIEW]: CHAMP is an HPC Access and Metadata Portal #3815
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss |
|
@whedon check repository from branch joss |
Wordcount for |
|
@arfon - I am happy to take this on if you wish. |
OK, the editor is @crvernon |
⚡ thanks! |
👋 @cc-a - I'll be your topic editor for this submission. The first step in this pre-review is to find at least 2 reviewers. If you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list). |
👋 @thurber - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
@crvernon - I am willing! |
OK, @thurber is now a reviewer |
👋 @yadudoc - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
👋 @acrlakshman - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
Sure. |
@whedon add @acrlakshman as reviewer |
OK, @acrlakshman is now a reviewer |
Alright @cc-a @thurber @acrlakshman I am going to close this Pre-Review and kick off the full review which you should receive a notification for. Thanks! |
@whedon start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #3824. |
Submitting author: @cc-a (Christopher Cave-Ayland)
Repository: https://github.com/ImperialCollegeLondon/champ
Version: v2.0.0
Editor: @crvernon
Reviewers: @thurber, @acrlakshman
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @cc-a. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@cc-a if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: