Skip to content

How to improve the ability to detect missed abnormal images? #2656

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
surlovely opened this issue Apr 10, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

How to improve the ability to detect missed abnormal images? #2656

surlovely opened this issue Apr 10, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@surlovely
Copy link

In patchcore, for practical applications, if a positive sample is overchecked, I can add the overtested sample to the training set. But when it comes to missing an anomalous sample, there seems to be nothing I can do. Do you have any ideas?

@alexriedel1
Copy link
Contributor

You could add the anomalous sample to the abnormal validation data. So the threshold might be better adjusted during validation.

@abc-125
Copy link
Contributor

abc-125 commented Apr 10, 2025

You can also try another model; it might work better than PatchCore (although it depends on your specific case, and the chances are not high, PatchCore is the best freely available model for now). I would suggest Reverse Distillation (available in Anomalib) or GLASS (not available in Anomalib yet).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants