You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In service provider environments, it's common for BGP sessions to operate within a specific VRF context. However, the Netbox BGP Plugin currently does not support assigning a VRF to a BGP Session.
We've been working around this limitation by using a custom field, but this approach is not ideal — especially when modeling larger and more complex network scenarios. Ideally, VRF assignment should be a native attribute of a BGP Session, similar to how it's handled for interfaces in NetBox.
This enhancement would allow for more accurate representation of real-world routing setups, where sessions may need to be configured in different routing contexts based on their assigned VRFs.
Would be great to see this considered for future development!
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In service provider environments, it's common for BGP sessions to operate within a specific VRF context. However, the Netbox BGP Plugin currently does not support assigning a VRF to a BGP Session.
We've been working around this limitation by using a custom field, but this approach is not ideal — especially when modeling larger and more complex network scenarios. Ideally, VRF assignment should be a native attribute of a BGP Session, similar to how it's handled for interfaces in NetBox.
This enhancement would allow for more accurate representation of real-world routing setups, where sessions may need to be configured in different routing contexts based on their assigned VRFs.
Would be great to see this considered for future development!
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: