You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In theory, the pointer could point to a hardware device where the store has some side-effects like increasing a queue pointer. A driver that wants to write dummy data could reasonably store an undef and need it to be actually performed.
Bug found when browsing idly through the code, I don't actually have a real-world case for it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Extended Description
All stores of undef values are deleted at the moment - including volatile stores:
Compiles to:
f: retq
In theory, the pointer could point to a hardware device where the store has some side-effects like increasing a queue pointer. A driver that wants to write dummy data could reasonably store an undef and need it to be actually performed.
Bug found when browsing idly through the code, I don't actually have a real-world case for it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: